From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Juan Quintela Subject: KVM call minutes for Tuesday, August 28th Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 16:28:09 +0200 Message-ID: <87k3wjf5vq.fsf@elfo.mitica> Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain To: KVM devel mailing list , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50718 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751133Ab2H1O3T (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Aug 2012 10:29:19 -0400 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi As almost everybody was at LinuxCon, we only started talking about the cpu patches from Eduardo and decided to left things for the list/next week. - cpu patches until 1.2 * get a new tree somewhere - 1.3 discussion will wait until 1.2 is out people too busy right now - Remember than KVM Forum abstracts deadline is this Friday (August 31th) Thanks, Juan. This were the topics asked from Eduardo: - *-user and qdev (recent RFCs didn't get many comments in the list, and I don't see a conclusion); - 1.2 branching, or creation of a "cpu-next" tree where "good to be merged" patches can live until 1.2 is done; - CPU code roadmap[1]. [1] For reference, this is the list of pending work that I want to target for 1.3: - -cpu help fix - CPU DeviceState - move CPU models to C - kill cpudef - unduplicate feature names - CPU properties - CPU model classes - Fix -cpu host to use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID properly - Fix -cpu check/enforce brokenness (including lots of refactoring of the currently-broken feature-flag checking code) - APIC ID threads/cores topology fix Thanks, Juan.