From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: "kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, "X86 ML" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/kvm/vmx: read MSR_FS_BASE from current->thread
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 16:55:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87muzdcmqe.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrXHBQjHR0w1YhJtzPyr6G1BzcBKRvY_smGufd0b6gizXQ@mail.gmail.com> (Andy Lutomirski's message of "Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:34:47 +0000")
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> writes:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2018 at 2:02 PM, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com> wrote:
>> vmx_save_host_state() is only called from kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run() so
>> the context is pretty well defined. Read MSR_FS_BASE from
>> current->thread.fsbase after calling save_fsgs() which takes care of
>> X86_BUG_NULL_SEG case now and will do RD[FG,GS]BASE when FSGSBASE
>> extensions are exposed to userspace (currently they are not).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h | 3 +++
>> arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 4 +++-
>> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>> index b0ccd4847a58..006352b85ba3 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -410,6 +410,9 @@ DECLARE_INIT_PER_CPU(irq_stack_union);
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(char *, irq_stack_ptr);
>> DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count);
>> extern asmlinkage void ignore_sysret(void);
>> +
>> +/* Save actual FS/GS selectors and bases to current->thread */
>> +void save_current_fsgs(void);
>> #else /* X86_64 */
>> #ifdef CONFIG_CC_STACKPROTECTOR
>> /*
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
>> index 9eb448c7859d..eb907fefe02e 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
>> @@ -205,6 +205,26 @@ static __always_inline void save_fsgs(struct task_struct *task)
>> save_base_legacy(task, task->thread.gsindex, GS);
>> }
>>
>> +/*
>> + * Currently, the only way for processes to change their FS/GS base is to call
>> + * ARCH_SET_FS/GS prctls and these reflect changes they make in task->thread.
>> + * There are, however, additional considerations:
>> + *
>> + * There is X86_BUG_NULL_SEG: on some CPUs writing '0' to FS/GS selectors zeroes
>> + * the base and on some it doesn't, we need to check for that
>> + * (see save_base_legacy()).
>> + *
>> + * When FSGSBASE extensions are enabled userspace processes will be able to
>> + * change their FS/GS bases without kernel intervention. save_fsgs() will
>> + * have to be updated to actually read FS and GS bases with RD[FG,GS]BASE
>> + * instructions.
>> + */
>
> This is all a very complicated way to say "while a process is running,
> current->thread.fsbase and current->thread.gsbase may not match the
> corresponding CPU registers. KVM wants an efficient way to save and
> restore FSBASE and GSBASE."
>
Well, I though it is not really obvious why "current->thread.fsbase and
current->thread.gsbase may not match the corresponding CPU registers"
:-) but save_base_legacy() is really nearby so I'll trim my comment in
v2.
> And how about changing this to:
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
> void save_fsgs_for_kvm(void)
> {
> save_fsgs(current);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(save_fsgs_for_kvm);
>
Sure. Actually, there is nothing KVM-specific in this function but KVM
will probably be the only user for the time being.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-03-12 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-12 14:02 [PATCH 0/3] x86/kvm: avoid expensive rdmsrs for FS/GS base MSRs Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-03-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kvm/vmx: read MSR_FS_BASE from current->thread Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-03-12 15:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-12 15:55 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2018-03-12 16:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-12 16:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-12 16:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-12 17:00 ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-03-12 17:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-13 13:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-03-13 13:24 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-03-12 14:02 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/kvm/vmx: read MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE " Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-03-12 14:03 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/kvm/vmx: avoid expensive rdmsr for MSR_GS_BASE Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-03-12 15:42 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87muzdcmqe.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox