From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Avoid writing to TSC page without an active vCPU
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 21:10:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o81c7lra.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yk8OJ5Y1IKky9cnz@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 676705ad1e23..3460bcd75bf2 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -979,10 +979,10 @@ enum hv_tsc_page_status {
>> HV_TSC_PAGE_GUEST_CHANGED,
>> /* TSC page MSR was written by KVM userspace, update pending */
>> HV_TSC_PAGE_HOST_CHANGED,
>> + /* TSC page needs to be updated due to internal KVM changes */
>> + HV_TSC_PAGE_KVM_CHANGED,
>
> Why add KVM_CHANGED? I don't see any reason to differentiate between userspace
> and KVM, and using KVM_CHANGED for the kvm_vm_ioctl_set_clock() case is wrong as
> that is very much a userspace initiated update, not a KVM update.
Indeed, there seems to be no benefit in differentiating between
HV_TSC_PAGE_HOST_CHANGED and HV_TSC_PAGE_KVM_CHANGED. Let me retest
without it, I'll be sending v2 shortly.
>
>> /* TSC page was properly set up and is currently active */
>> HV_TSC_PAGE_SET,
>> - /* TSC page is currently being updated and therefore is inactive */
>> - HV_TSC_PAGE_UPDATING,
>> /* TSC page was set up with an inaccessible GPA */
>> HV_TSC_PAGE_BROKEN,
>> };
>
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-07 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-07 15:47 [PATCH] KVM: x86: hyper-v: Avoid writing to TSC page without an active vCPU Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-04-07 16:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-07 19:10 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o81c7lra.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=naresh.kamboju@linaro.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox