From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Amit Shah <amit.shah@qumranet.com>
Cc: kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, chrisw@redhat.com,
allen.m.kay@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gcosta@redhat.com, avi@qumranet.com,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, BENAMI@il.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM PV Guest: Implement paravirtualized DMA
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:31:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87od7shjnv.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1209465451-3758-4-git-send-email-amit.shah@qumranet.com> (Amit Shah's message of "Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:37:31 +0300")
Amit Shah <amit.shah@qumranet.com> writes:
> +
> +static struct page *page;
> +static unsigned long page_gfn;
Bad variable names
> +
> +const struct dma_mapping_ops *orig_dma_ops;
I suspect real dma ops stacking will need some further thought than
your simple hacks
> +
> + match = find_matching_pt_dev(&pt_devs_head, &pv_pci_info);
> + if (match) {
> + r = match->is_pv;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(page_address(page), &pv_pci_info, sizeof(pv_pci_info));
Note that on 32bit page_address() might be not mapped.
> +
> + npages = get_order(size) + 1;
Are you sure that's correct? It looks quite bogus. order is a 2 logarithm,
normally npages = 1 << order
if you want npages from order the correct need 1 << order
Haven't read further, but to be honest the code doesn't seem to be anywhere
near merging quality.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-29 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-29 10:37 PV DMA for PCI passthrough devices for KVM Amit Shah
2008-04-29 10:37 ` [PATCH] x86 DMA: Handle devices assigned to the guest by the host Amit Shah
2008-04-29 10:37 ` [PATCH] KVM x86: Handle hypercalls for assigned PCI devices Amit Shah
2008-04-29 10:37 ` [PATCH] KVM PV Guest: Implement paravirtualized DMA Amit Shah
2008-04-29 13:31 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-04-29 13:59 ` Amit Shah
2008-04-29 14:44 ` [PATCH] KVM x86: Handle hypercalls for assigned PCI devices Glauber Costa
2008-04-29 15:58 ` Amit Shah
2008-04-29 22:48 ` Avi Kivity
2008-04-30 6:05 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-05-01 13:18 ` Amit Shah
2008-04-29 13:14 ` [PATCH] x86 DMA: Handle devices assigned to the guest by the host Andi Kleen
2008-04-29 13:49 ` Amit Shah
2008-04-30 6:29 ` Muli Ben-Yehuda
2008-04-29 13:15 ` PV DMA for PCI passthrough devices for KVM Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87od7shjnv.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=BENAMI@il.ibm.com \
--cc=allen.m.kay@intel.com \
--cc=amit.shah@qumranet.com \
--cc=avi@qumranet.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=gcosta@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox