From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: KVM call for 2016-02-14
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 13:48:37 +0100
Message-ID: <87poiamlwa.fsf@emacs.mitica>
References: <87lgt83mbx.fsf@emacs.mitica>
        <20170215152010.GE16064@stefanha-x1.localdomain>
Reply-To: quintela@redhat.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Cc: QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
        KVM devel mailing list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:34940 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752397AbdBVMsn (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 22 Feb 2017 07:48:43 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20170215152010.GE16064@stefanha-x1.localdomain> (Stefan
        Hajnoczi's message of "Wed, 15 Feb 2017 15:20:10 +0000")
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 02:59:14PM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Direction of QEMU and toolstack in light of Google Cloud blog:
>> https://cloudplatform.googleblog.com/2017/01/7-ways-we-harden-our-KVM-hypervisor-at-Google-Cloud-security-in-plaintext.html
>
> This is an interesting topic.  I guess everyone missed the call.  Will
> this topic be discussed in the next call?

Yeap.  Will send it on the agenda later.

Thanks, Juan.