From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: skip host CPUID call for hypervisor leaves
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 12:08:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r191jqh9.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220120175015.1747392-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> Hypervisor leaves are always synthesized by __do_cpuid_func. Just return
> zeroes and do not ask the host, it would return a bogus value anyway if
> it were used.
Why always bogus? Nested virtualization is a thing, isn't it? :-) It
is, however, true that __do_cpuid_func() will throw the result away.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 3902c28fb6cb..fd949e89120a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -692,9 +692,17 @@ static struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *do_host_cpuid(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array,
>
> entry = &array->entries[array->nent++];
>
> + memset(entry, 0, sizeof(*entry));
> entry->function = function;
> entry->index = index;
> - entry->flags = 0;
> + switch (function & 0xC0000000) {
> + case 0x40000000:
> + /* Hypervisor leaves are always synthesized by __do_cpuid_func. */
> + return entry;
FWIW, 0x40000XXX leaves are not the only ones where we don't use
do_host_cpuid() result at all, e.g. I can see that we also return
constant values for 0x3, 0x5, 0x6, 0xC0000002 - 0xC0000004.
Out of pure curiosity, what's the motivation for the patch? We seem to
only use __do_cpuid_func() to serve KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID/KVM_GET_EMULATED_CPUID,
not for kvm_emulate_cpuid() so these few CPUID calls we save here should
not give us any performace gain..
> +
> + default:
> + break;
> + }
>
> cpuid_count(entry->function, entry->index,
> &entry->eax, &entry->ebx, &entry->ecx, &entry->edx);
The patch seems to be correct, so
Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-21 11:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-20 17:50 [PATCH] KVM: x86: skip host CPUID call for hypervisor leaves Paolo Bonzini
2022-01-21 11:08 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-01-26 17:23 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r191jqh9.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).