From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFDD71A29A; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:05:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744650333; cv=none; b=EjUhihcEugoLWvo/9QxAVW45Q2r3HRrDEnAQ/qvWvanp2eBtJAMliVOM8ZlrPQV7kTHZiJ7uid+JfQPEMZ12mY4WHHZmia6KWrS+7yomdbygbogfV7XXuuBIJnorSobVytXQefIryL19pw77NmIuZDkd4mTDTBbzgBIRoCAW5nw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1744650333; c=relaxed/simple; bh=t/KetL+A/wJmvv1bmNlxqP2hW4xNEy5F9j0XPihvCik=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=E93diinsn9bcmaShqPz4mMzX511Q96I21rMtlRk4hOMva8C+Ym4egKGOKNG/3sZwL0QDEPqxRwuOYrbTou/vh57hcb4eBYjx/iKm+UkEXbocmVho+N0nYcwb2ubpfqS+t7tR1cP6LExOlvqCtY+hJQ2l7wqs8FqfHct8oPrMU2E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=HLuj6g/B; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="HLuj6g/B" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net BB64641062 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1744650330; bh=ku9qE/yuQA7Fzf/9Lh2nHhyG6AWPqEHjv/q7LJKhUMM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=HLuj6g/ByovvmWlQASFCNPMXHfnpMwyqzOV9YbOmpSH2BFQginLZGfj43MSyVPo+e YCUa8Q1ZdB9hRCs8dBoL/ZsupWlkp7WwA9Mi5s7KcTq6UASpAgF6IMMAbFxzL75qql XNm5OPIgrbkbDXSe/f7U1a/QW5wl4O22n/HaZfFAFLrLjBO2LofvAZFWtfHqngnPve RC82/s5jr2rHJTFlKX0jUOQqFGYXq12pzL9x0bHqdWhmz0s/OmW4LdhXg/81xHGVhg QZTYltnJ7rhh07F5LugI52yvlTSNZrfMclBbgDDa7hoBmmdynr1O5aDWxcqxX45AEF ttxQKqFxw3vXA== Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:280:4600:2da9::1fe]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB64641062; Mon, 14 Apr 2025 17:05:30 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: "Xin Li (Intel)" , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] Documentation: kvm: Fix a section number In-Reply-To: <20250414165146.2279450-1-xin@zytor.com> References: <20250414165146.2279450-1-xin@zytor.com> Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2025 11:05:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87sema8yhy.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain "Xin Li (Intel)" writes: > The previous section is 7.41, thus this should be 7.42. > > Signed-off-by: Xin Li (Intel) > --- > Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > index 47c7c3f92314..58478b470860 100644 > --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst > @@ -8478,7 +8478,7 @@ ENOSYS for the others. > When enabled, KVM will exit to userspace with KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT of > type KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SUSPEND to process the guest suspend request. > > -7.37 KVM_CAP_ARM_WRITABLE_IMP_ID_REGS > +7.42 KVM_CAP_ARM_WRITABLE_IMP_ID_REGS > ------------------------------------- The fix seems fine but ... I have to ask ... do the section numbers buy anything here? We have a documentation system that can do nice cross-references when needed, so I'm not sure that these numbers add anything other than a bit of manual maintenance hassle. Thanks, jon