From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu,
drjones@redhat.com, eric.auger@redhat.com,
alexandru.elisei@arm.com, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
oupton@google.com, james.morse@arm.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
shuah@kernel.org, jingzhangos@google.com, pshier@google.com,
rananta@google.com, reijiw@google.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic: check redist region is not above the VM IPA size
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 13:30:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sfxzv37z.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210910004919.1610709-2-ricarkol@google.com>
Hi Ricardo,
On Fri, 10 Sep 2021 01:49:18 +0100,
Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com> wrote:
>
> Verify that the redistributor regions do not extend beyond the
> VM-specified IPA size (phys_size). This can happen when using
> KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST or KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGIONS
> with:
>
> base + size > phys_size AND base < phys_size
>
> Add the missing check into vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region() which is called
> when setting the regions, and into vgic_v3_check_base() which is called
> when attempting the first vcpu-run. The vcpu-run check does not apply to
> KVM_VGIC_V3_ADDR_TYPE_REDIST_REGIONS because the regions size is known
> before the first vcpu-run. Finally, this patch also enables some extra
> tests in vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region() by calculating "size" early for
> the legacy redist api.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c | 7 ++++++-
> arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c | 4 ++++
> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> index a09cdc0b953c..055671bede85 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-mmio-v3.c
> @@ -796,7 +796,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region(struct kvm *kvm, uint32_t index,
> struct vgic_dist *d = &kvm->arch.vgic;
> struct vgic_redist_region *rdreg;
> struct list_head *rd_regions = &d->rd_regions;
> - size_t size = count * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
> + int nr_vcpus = atomic_read(&kvm->online_vcpus);
> + size_t size = count ? count * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE :
> + nr_vcpus * KVM_VGIC_V3_REDIST_SIZE;
> int ret;
>
> /* cross the end of memory ? */
> @@ -834,6 +836,9 @@ static int vgic_v3_alloc_redist_region(struct kvm *kvm, uint32_t index,
> if (vgic_v3_rdist_overlap(kvm, base, size))
> return -EINVAL;
>
> + if (base + size > kvm_phys_size(kvm))
> + return -E2BIG;
> +
> rdreg = kzalloc(sizeof(*rdreg), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!rdreg)
> return -ENOMEM;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> index 66004f61cd83..5afd9f6f68f6 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/vgic/vgic-v3.c
> @@ -512,6 +512,10 @@ bool vgic_v3_check_base(struct kvm *kvm)
> if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) <
> rdreg->base)
> return false;
> +
> + if (rdreg->base + vgic_v3_rd_region_size(kvm, rdreg) >
> + kvm_phys_size(kvm))
> + return false;
> }
>
> if (IS_VGIC_ADDR_UNDEF(d->vgic_dist_base))
How about vgic-v2? From what I can see, the placement of the
distributor and CPU interface should be subjected to the same checks
(see vgic_v2_check_base()).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-20 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-10 0:49 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: arm64: vgic-v3: Missing check for redist region above the VM IPA size Ricardo Koller
2021-09-10 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: arm64: vgic: check redist region is not " Ricardo Koller
2021-09-20 12:30 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-09-20 21:06 ` Ricardo Koller
2021-09-10 0:49 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: tests for vgic redist regions " Ricardo Koller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sfxzv37z.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jingzhangos@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=oupton@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pshier@google.com \
--cc=rananta@google.com \
--cc=reijiw@google.com \
--cc=ricarkol@google.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox