From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] selftests: kvm: introduce cpu_has_svm() check
Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2020 10:14:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sgffgq47.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529151822.GB520@linux.intel.com>
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:
> On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:04:06PM +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> More tests may want to check if the CPU is Intel or AMD in
>> guest code, separate cpu_has_svm() and put it as static
>> inline to svm_util.h.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/svm_util.h | 10 ++++++++++
>> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/state_test.c | 9 +--------
>> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/svm_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/svm_util.h
>> index cd037917fece..b1057773206a 100644
>> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/svm_util.h
>> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86_64/svm_util.h
>> @@ -35,4 +35,14 @@ void generic_svm_setup(struct svm_test_data *svm, void *guest_rip, void *guest_r
>> void run_guest(struct vmcb *vmcb, uint64_t vmcb_gpa);
>> void nested_svm_check_supported(void);
>>
>> +static inline bool cpu_has_svm(void)
>> +{
>> + u32 eax = 0x80000001, ecx;
>> +
>> + asm volatile("cpuid" :
>> + "=a" (eax), "=c" (ecx) : "0" (eax) : "ebx", "edx");
>
> u32 eax, ecx;
>
> asm("cpuid" : "=a" (eax), "=c" (ecx) : "a" (0x80000001) : "ebx", "edx");
>
> The volatile shouldn't be needed, e.g. no one should be using this purely
> for its seralization properties, and I don't see any reason to put the leaf
> number into a variable.
>
> Alternatively, adding a proper cpuid framework to processor.h would likely
> be useful in the long run.
>
All true, even better would be to find a way to include the definition
of native_cpuid*() from arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h but I didn't
explore these options yet, was trying to address the immediate issue
with Paolo's SVM series. It can probably be done when there is a second
user of cpuid in tests which needs to check something different from SVM
bit.
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-01 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-29 13:04 [PATCH 1/2] selftests: kvm: introduce cpu_has_svm() check Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-29 13:04 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests: kvm: fix smm test on SVM Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-05-29 15:28 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-05-29 15:18 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests: kvm: introduce cpu_has_svm() check Sean Christopherson
2020-06-01 8:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sgffgq47.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).