From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: "Jim Mattson" <jmattson@google.com>,
"kvm list" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/kvm/lapic: always disable MMIO interface in x2APIC mode
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2018 11:14:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh41nkz5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e3b7080f-b788-048b-6f3a-e1a90e4206b7@redhat.com> (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Fri, 27 Jul 2018 19:00:38 +0200")
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> writes:
> On 27/07/2018 18:48, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> On a physical machine, I would expect the default local APIC page to
>> fall in the PCI hole, so it would be correct to sink writes and to
>> return all ones for reads. Does qemu implement a PCI hole, and does
>> this address fall into it?
>
> It does implement a PCI hole, but when using the kernel LAPIC it expects
> that only devices write to that range; therefore that address doesn't
> fall into the PCI hole, and instead it generates an MSIs.
Yes, and that's why I believe it's correct to never forward lapic
reads/writes from KVM to userspace when lapic is in kernel.
"RFC" was mostly about the inconsistency with the case when APIC access
page is in use. To be 100% correct I would suggest to somehow make it
behave like MMIO hole in case we're in x2APIC/disabled mode too.
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-30 9:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-27 14:44 [PATCH RFC] x86/kvm/lapic: always disable MMIO interface in x2APIC mode Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-07-27 16:48 ` Jim Mattson
2018-07-27 17:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-07-30 9:14 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2018-08-02 11:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-08-02 13:30 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2018-08-02 13:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87sh41nkz5.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox