From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Max Kellermann <max.kellermann@ionos.com>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch/x86/entry_fred: don't set up KVM IRQs if KVM is disabled
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 22:45:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ttm8axrq.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5a332064-0a26-4bb9-8a3e-c99604d2d919@redhat.com>
On Fri, Feb 16 2024 at 07:31, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/16/24 03:10, Xin Li wrote:
>
> It is intentional that KVM-related things are compiled out completely
> if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM), because then it's also not necessary to
> have
That's a matter of taste. In both cases _ALL_ KVM related things are
compiled out.
#ifdeffing out the vector numbers is silly to begin with because these
vector numbers stay assigned to KVM whether KVM is enabled or not.
And no, I don't think it's a net win to have the #ifdeffery in that
table. Look at apic_idts[] in arch/x86/kernel/idt.c how this ends up
looking. It's unreadable gunk.
The few NULL defines in a header file next to the real stuff
#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM)
.....
#else
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_ipi NULL
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_wakeup_ipi NULL
# define fred_sysvec_kvm_posted_intr_nested_ipi NULL
#endif
are not hurting at all and they are at a place where #ifdeffery is
required anyway. That's a very common pattern all over the kernel and it
limits the #ifdef horror to _ONE_ place.
With your change you propagate the #ifdefffery to the multiple and the
very wrong places for absolutely zero practical value. The resulting
binary code is exactly the same for the price of tasteless #ifdeffery in
places where it matters.
Please get rid of this #ifdef in the vector header and don't inflict
bad taste on everyone.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 21:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20240215133631.136538-1-max.kellermann@ionos.com>
2024-02-15 19:55 ` [PATCH] arch/x86/entry_fred: don't set up KVM IRQs if KVM is disabled Sean Christopherson
2024-02-16 2:10 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 6:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-16 17:41 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 17:47 ` Xin Li
2024-02-16 21:45 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-02-16 23:00 ` Max Kellermann
2024-02-17 0:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-17 9:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-02-17 22:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-02-16 21:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2024-02-16 22:29 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ttm8axrq.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=max.kellermann@ionos.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox