From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Markus Armbruster Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for 2013-12-10 Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 15:32:29 +0100 Message-ID: <87txef5ugy.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <877gbdgce4.fsf@elfo.elfo> <52A70B10.7020408@redhat.com> <87d2l4j272.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel qemu-devel , KVM devel mailing list , Juan Quintela To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10918 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751351Ab3LKOch (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:32:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Anthony Liguori's message of "Tue, 10 Dec 2013 06:53:34 -0800") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Anthony Liguori writes: > On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 4:54 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote >> Paolo Bonzini writes: >> >>> Il 10/12/2013 12:42, Juan Quintela ha scritto: >>>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> Please, send any topic that you are interested in covering. >>> >>> May not need a phone call, but I'll drop it here: what happened to >>> acknowledgement emails from the patches script? >>> >>> Also, Anthony, it looks like you're still adjusting to the new job. If >>> you need help with anything, I guess today's call could be a good place >>> to discuss it. >>> >>> And someone needs to send out the email saying that 1.7.0 is out and >>> that the next version will be 2.0! >> >> Speaking of sending out e-mail: did I miss the promised followup to the >> key signing party? > > I need to find the papers from KVM Forum which are somewhere among the > stacks of boxes here :-/ Please do, because the longer the delay, the fewer participants will be willing and able to find *their* papers.