From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Thomas Lefebvre <thomas.lefebvre3@gmail.com>,
seanjc@google.com, pbonzini@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [BUG] KVM: x86: kvmclock jumps ~253 years on Hyper-V nested virt due to cross-CPU raw TSC inconsistency
Date: Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:17:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87v7e3mbgj.fsf@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKdXbaV1PTwetd4zs6+6Rp7h0dwHU1ygMoof5eAcfL6XYZF1xA@mail.gmail.com>
Thomas Lefebvre <thomas.lefebvre3@gmail.com> writes:
...
>
> Under Hyper-V, raw RDTSC values are not consistent across vCPUs.
> The hypervisor corrects them only through the TSC page scale/offset.
> If pvclock_update_vm_gtod_copy() runs on CPU 0 and __get_kvmclock()
> later runs on CPU 1 where the raw TSC is lower, the unsigned
> subtraction wraps.
>
According to the TLFS, reference TSC page is partition wide:
"The hypervisor provides a partition-wide virtual reference TSC page
which is overlaid on the partition’s GPA space. A partition’s reference
time stamp counter page is accessed through the Reference TSC MSR."
so if as you say RAW rdtsc value is inconsistent across vCPUs, I can
hardly see how we can use this time source at all, even without
KVM. scale/offset are the same for all vCPUs.
I think the fix here is to avoid setting up Hyper-V TSC page clocksource
in L1. Unfortunately, with unsynchronized TSCs this will leave us the
only choice for a sane clocksource: raw HV_X64_MSR_TIME_REF_COUNT MSR
reads.
--
Vitaly
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-07 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-05 22:10 [BUG] KVM: x86: kvmclock jumps ~253 years on Hyper-V nested virt due to cross-CPU raw TSC inconsistency Thomas Lefebvre
2026-04-06 14:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-04-07 8:23 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2026-04-07 8:17 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87v7e3mbgj.fsf@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lefebvre3@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox