From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] KVM: nVMX: optimize prepare_vmcs02{,_full} for Enlightened VMCS case Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2018 10:37:43 +0200 Message-ID: <87va93pv6w.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> References: <20180621123046.29606-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180621123046.29606-7-vkuznets@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Roman Kagan , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , Mohammed Gamal , Cathy Avery , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jim Mattson , Liran Alon To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: In-Reply-To: (Paolo Bonzini's message of "Tue, 24 Jul 2018 19:09:04 +0200") Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 21/06/2018 14:30, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> +static __always_inline bool evmcs_needs_write(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, >> + u16 clean_field) >> +{ >> + if (vmx->nested.dirty_vmcs12) >> + return true; > > Why is this needed? If it weren't for it, you could pass hv_evmcs > directly to evmcs_needs_write, which would simplify the code a bit in > the caller. This is an equivalent of prepare_vmcs02()/prepare_vmcs02_full() split for eVMCS case: when we switch from L2 guest A to L2 guest B we need to write the whole VMCS so evmcs_needs_write() needs to return true. We can, however, make an optimisation: forcefuly reset hv_clean_fields mask on enlightened vmptrld making 'dirty_vmcs12' check redundant. This series was posted quite some time ago, I'll rebase and re-test with the fix included. Thanks! -- Vitaly