From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rusty Russell Subject: Re: RFD: virtio balloon API use (was Re: [PATCH 5 of 5] virtio: expose added descriptors immediately) Date: Tue, 03 Jul 2012 10:17:46 +0930 Message-ID: <87vci5wtzh.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <20120701092051.GA4515@redhat.com> <87d34fx990.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <20120702072558.GA8268@redhat.com> <20120702160814.GB1750@t510.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization To: Rafael Aquini , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20120702160814.GB1750@t510.redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 13:08:19 -0300, Rafael Aquini wrote: > As 'locking in balloon', may I assume the approach I took for the compaction case > is OK and aligned to address these concerns of yours? If not, do not hesitate in > giving me your thoughts, please. I'm respinning a V3 series to address a couple > of extra nitpicks from the compaction standpoint, and I'd love to be able to > address any extra concern you might have on the balloon side of that work. It's orthogonal, though looks like they clash textually :( I'll re-spin MST's patch on top of yours, and include both in my tree, otherwise linux-next will have to do the merge. But I'll await your push before pushing to Linus next merge window. Thanks, Rusty.