Re: [PATCH 1/8] KVM: arm64: Add generic check for system-supported vCPU features

[Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>]

On Wed, 20 Sep 2023 20:50:29 +0100,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev> wrote:
> 
> To date KVM has relied on kvm_reset_vcpu() failing when the vCPU feature
> flags are unsupported by the system. This is a bit messy since
> kvm_reset_vcpu() is called at runtime outside of the KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT
> ioctl when it is expected to succeed. Further complicating the matter is
> that kvm_reset_vcpu() must tolerate be idemptotent to the config_lock,
> as it isn't consistently called with the lock held.
> 
> Prepare to move feature compatibility checks out of kvm_reset_vcpu() with
> a 'generic' check that compares the user-provided flags with a computed
> maximum feature set for the system.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 16 +++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 4866b3f7b4ea..66f3720cdd3a 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -1190,6 +1190,16 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_irq_line(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_irq_level *irq_level,
>  	return -EINVAL;
>  }
>  
> +static unsigned long system_supported_vcpu_features(void)
> +{
> +	unsigned long features = KVM_VCPU_VALID_FEATURES;
> +
> +	if (!cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HAS_32BIT_EL1))

I think we can now convert this to a cpus_have_final_cap(), as Mark is
getting rid of the helper altogether, see [1].

Thanks,

	M.
	
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919092850.1940729-1-mark.rutland@arm.com


-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.