From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F558C38A24 for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6ADF2073A for ; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726807AbgEGNku convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 09:40:50 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:54980 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726900AbgEGNku (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 May 2020 09:40:50 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 047DeHWH160271; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:40:48 -0400 Received: from pps.reinject (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30s4r6g2kx-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 May 2020 09:40:48 -0400 Received: from m0098417.ppops.net (m0098417.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by pps.reinject (8.16.0.36/8.16.0.36) with SMTP id 047DebWY162527; Thu, 7 May 2020 09:40:48 -0400 Received: from ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (63.31.33a9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.51.49.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 30s4r6g2k6-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 May 2020 09:40:48 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id 047DUJqQ009647; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:46 GMT Received: from b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.26.194]) by ppma04ams.nl.ibm.com with ESMTP id 30s0g5uebu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 07 May 2020 13:40:46 +0000 Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.61]) by b06avi18878370.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 047DehI460228050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:43 GMT Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A2811C054; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F357511C04A; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from marcibm (unknown [9.145.33.209]) by d06av25.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 7 May 2020 13:40:42 +0000 (GMT) From: Marc Hartmayer To: Andrew Jones , Marc Hartmayer Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Huth , David Hildenbrand , Janosch Frank , Cornelia Huck , Paolo Bonzini , Christian Borntraeger , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests RFC] s390x: Add Protected VM support In-Reply-To: <20200506135016.ml3k73siokhltyl5@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> References: <20200506124636.21876-1-mhartmay@linux.ibm.com> <20200506135016.ml3k73siokhltyl5@kamzik.brq.redhat.com> Date: Thu, 07 May 2020 15:40:39 +0200 Message-ID: <87wo5n6ey0.fsf@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.216,18.0.676 definitions=2020-05-07_08:2020-05-07,2020-05-07 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 clxscore=1015 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 impostorscore=0 bulkscore=0 suspectscore=1 adultscore=0 phishscore=0 mlxscore=0 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2005070106 Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 03:50 PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2020 at 02:46:36PM +0200, Marc Hartmayer wrote: >> Add support for Protected Virtual Machine (PVM) tests. For starting a >> PVM guest we must be able to generate a PVM image by using the >> `genprotimg` tool from the s390-tools collection. This requires the >> ability to pass a machine-specific host-key document, so the option >> `--host-key-document` is added to the configure script. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc Hartmayer >> --- […snip…] > + >> "$cmd" "$testname" "$groups" "$smp" "$kernel" "$opts" "$arch" "$check" "$accel" "$timeout" >> + if [ "${pv_support}" == 1 ]; then >> + pv_cmd "$cmd" "$testname" "$groups" "$smp" "$kernel" "$opts" "$arch" "$check" "$accel" "$timeout" >> + fi >> exec {fd}<&- >> } >> -- >> 2.17.0 >> > > I don't think making the changes to scripts/common.bash will work for > standalone tests. Why not do this stuff in s390x/run instead? Okay, I’ve looked into the code, and the reason for this approach is that I want to treat the PVM and the “normal” test case as two separate test cases, but using the same test configuration. I don’t see how I can achieve this by editing s390x/run and for the standalone case. Maybe this approach is already broken and I should simply add the PVM testcases as extra test cases to the unittest.cfg - but this would result in duplicated code in the configuration file. > Also, > do you need the pv_support[ed] parameter? You could just do a > [ -f "${kernel%.elf}.pv.img" ] to decide if you should run again > with PV, right? > > Thanks, > drew > -- Kind regards / Beste Grüße Marc Hartmayer IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gregor Pillen Geschäftsführung: Dirk Wittkopp Sitz der Gesellschaft: Böblingen Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294