From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [FIX REQUEST] Need better management for include/linux/*.h Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:51:31 +0200 Message-ID: <87ws6e9td8.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> References: <1247303928.2678.46.camel@ht.satnam> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, hskinnemoen@atmel.com, Avi Kivity , kvm , LKML To: Jaswinder Singh Rajput Return-path: Received: from one.firstfloor.org ([213.235.205.2]:52455 "EHLO one.firstfloor.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752031AbZGLIvh (ORCPT ); Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:51:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1247303928.2678.46.camel@ht.satnam> (Jaswinder Singh Rajput's message of "Sat, 11 Jul 2009 14:48:48 +0530") Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Jaswinder Singh Rajput writes: > Hello all, > > As include/linux/*.h file count is going to reach 1000. > > We need to do some better techniques to reduce the number of files and > add some hierarchy levels like sub directories where possible. Why? 100 or 1000 really doesn't make much difference; in both cases you cannot easily browse and have to use tab completion. And I doubt your reorganization would go below 100. I would just leave it as it is. -Andi -- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.