From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: inhibit APICv when KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ active
Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:00:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y265mj9k.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b7949ae8094217c92b714cfd193fc571654cea7.camel@redhat.com>
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> writes:
> On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 14:28 +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com> writes:
>>
>> > KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ relies on interrupts being injected using
>> > standard kvm's inject_pending_event, and not via APICv/AVIC.
>> >
>> > Since this is a debug feature, just inhibit it while it
>> > is in use.
>> >
>> > Fixes: 61e5f69ef0837 ("KVM: x86: implement KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ")
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>
>> > ---
>> > arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> > arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c | 3 ++-
>> > arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 ++-
>> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 +++
>> > 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> > index 88fce6ab4bbd7..8f6e15b95a4d8 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> > @@ -1034,6 +1034,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_msr_filter {
>> > #define APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_IRQWIN 3
>> > #define APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_PIT_REINJ 4
>> > #define APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_X2APIC 5
>> > +#define APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ 6
>> >
>> > struct kvm_arch {
>> > unsigned long n_used_mmu_pages;
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
>> > index 8052d92069e01..affc0ea98d302 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/avic.c
>> > @@ -904,7 +904,8 @@ bool svm_check_apicv_inhibit_reasons(ulong bit)
>> > BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_NESTED) |
>> > BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_IRQWIN) |
>> > BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_PIT_REINJ) |
>> > - BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_X2APIC);
>> > + BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_X2APIC) |
>> > + BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ);
>> >
>> > return supported & BIT(bit);
>> > }
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> > index 71f54d85f104c..e4fc9ff7cd944 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> > @@ -7565,7 +7565,8 @@ static void hardware_unsetup(void)
>> > static bool vmx_check_apicv_inhibit_reasons(ulong bit)
>> > {
>> > ulong supported = BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_DISABLE) |
>> > - BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV);
>> > + BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_HYPERV) |
>> > + BIT(APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ);
>> >
>> > return supported & BIT(bit);
>> > }
>> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> > index ac83d873d65b0..dccf927baa4dd 100644
>> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
>> > @@ -10747,6 +10747,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> > if (vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_SINGLESTEP)
>> > vcpu->arch.singlestep_rip = kvm_get_linear_rip(vcpu);
>> >
>> > + kvm_request_apicv_update(vcpu->kvm,
>> > + !(vcpu->guest_debug & KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ),
>> > + APICV_INHIBIT_REASON_BLOCKIRQ);
>> > /*
>> > * Trigger an rflags update that will inject or remove the trace
>> > * flags.
>>
>> This fixes the problem for me!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
>
> Cool!
>>
>
> Now that I think about it, since guest debug flags are per-vcpu, this code won't
> work if there are multiple vCPUs and you enable KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ on all of them
> and then disable on this flag on just one of vCPUs, because this code will re-enable APICv/AVIC in this case.
> A counter is needed, like you did in synic/autoeoi case.
>
Right, I completely forgot about this peculiarity!
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-03 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-03 9:42 [PATCH v2] KVM: x86: inhibit APICv when KVM_GUESTDBG_BLOCKIRQ active Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-03 13:28 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-11-03 13:49 ` Maxim Levitsky
2021-11-03 14:00 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-11-03 14:39 ` Maxim Levitsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y265mj9k.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox