From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
x86@kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix exception untrigger on ret to user
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2021 09:20:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87zgva3162.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210627233819.857906-1-stsp2@yandex.ru>
Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru> writes:
> When returning to user, the special care is taken about the
> exception that was already injected to VMCS but not yet to guest.
> cancel_injection removes such exception from VMCS. It is set as
> pending, and if the user does KVM_SET_REGS, it gets completely canceled.
>
> This didn't happen though, because the vcpu->arch.exception.injected
> and vcpu->arch.exception.pending were forgotten to update in
> cancel_injection. As the result, KVM_SET_REGS didn't cancel out
> anything, and the exception was re-injected on the next KVM_RUN,
> even though the guest registers (like EIP) were already modified.
> This was leading to an exception coming from the "wrong place".
It shouldn't be that hard to reproduce this in selftests, I
believe. 'exception.injected' can even be set through
KVM_SET_VCPU_EVENTS and then we call KVM_SET_REGS. Alternatively, we can
trigger a real exception from the guest. Could you maybe add something
like this to tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/set_sregs_test.c?
>
> This patch makes sure the vcpu->arch.exception.injected and
> vcpu->arch.exception.pending are in sync with the reality (and
> with VMCS). Also it adds WARN_ON_ONCE() to __set_regs() to make
> sure vcpu->arch.exception.injected is never set here, because
> if it is, the exception context is going to be corrupted the same
> way it was before that patch.
> Adding WARN_ON_ONCE() alone, without the fix, was verified to
> actually trigger and detect a buggy scenario.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stas Sergeev <stsp2@yandex.ru>
>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> CC: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> CC: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
> CC: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>
> CC: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
> CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
> CC: x86@kernel.org
> CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
> CC: kvm@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index e0f4a46649d7..bc6ca8641824 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -9450,7 +9450,11 @@ static int vcpu_enter_guest(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> cancel_injection:
> if (req_immediate_exit)
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> - static_call(kvm_x86_cancel_injection)(vcpu);
> + if (vcpu->arch.exception.injected) {
> + static_call(kvm_x86_cancel_injection)(vcpu);
> + vcpu->arch.exception.injected = false;
> + vcpu->arch.exception.pending = true;
> + }
> if (unlikely(vcpu->arch.apic_attention))
> kvm_lapic_sync_from_vapic(vcpu);
> out:
> @@ -9822,6 +9826,7 @@ static void __set_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_regs *regs)
> kvm_rip_write(vcpu, regs->rip);
> kvm_set_rflags(vcpu, regs->rflags | X86_EFLAGS_FIXED);
>
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(vcpu->arch.exception.injected);
> vcpu->arch.exception.pending = false;
>
> kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-28 7:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-27 23:38 [PATCH] KVM: X86: Fix exception untrigger on ret to user Stas Sergeev
2021-06-28 7:20 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2021-06-28 9:12 ` stsp
2021-06-28 10:07 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-28 10:32 ` stsp
2021-06-28 10:56 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-28 11:00 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2021-06-28 11:27 ` stsp
2021-06-28 16:39 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-28 16:57 ` stsp
2021-06-28 16:19 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-28 17:06 ` stsp
2021-06-28 17:44 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-28 22:23 ` stsp
2021-06-28 22:35 ` Jim Mattson
2021-06-28 22:52 ` stsp
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-06-28 12:46 Stas Sergeev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87zgva3162.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=stsp2@yandex.ru \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox