From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vitaly Kuznetsov Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 09/12] x86/kvm/nVMX: allow bare VMXON state migration Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2018 15:59:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87zhvernzs.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> References: <20180913170522.24876-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <20180913170522.24876-10-vkuznets@redhat.com> <8d6b85c4-16c6-cbde-22ec-ee61df0c49fd@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= , Roman Kagan , "K. Y. Srinivasan" , Haiyang Zhang , Stephen Hemminger , "Michael Kelley \(EOSG\)" , Jim Mattson , Liran Alon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Paolo Bonzini , kvm@vger.kernel.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: <8d6b85c4-16c6-cbde-22ec-ee61df0c49fd@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org Paolo Bonzini writes: > On 13/09/2018 19:05, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >> It is perfectly valid for a guest to do VMXON and not do VMPTRLD. This >> state needs to be preserved on migration. >> >> Signed-off-by: Vitaly Kuznetsov > > Please cover this in state-test.c too. > Sure, this is kind of tested in the newly introduced evmcs_test but makes perfect sense to do this in state_test too. The series also got rotten and requires a rebase, will do that. Thanks, -- Vitaly