From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.5 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCDA2C433E1 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10CA20748 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2020 00:18:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727810AbgHKASl (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:18:41 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:51176 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726733AbgHKASk (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Aug 2020 20:18:40 -0400 IronPort-SDR: +xpmmPFEFMBjfLrEOey0zxjlg6bq84P2ntTOTljTHsWB70fOo9uJNDqMxB2eyi0Z4NzNruRfxZ Ty2h8plq3Pbg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6000,8403,9709"; a="217975322" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,458,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="217975322" X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48]) by orsmga105.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Aug 2020 17:18:39 -0700 IronPort-SDR: AYJ9db4E945V2WtApKiuVM8pT5M9W3BAKjBmVMvHTzmF6iAw4mktxTnYYrXWBju9Jp4WrFJ/NR 4NoU01x+yWTQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.75,458,1589266800"; d="scan'208";a="317540213" Received: from zhangj4-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.255.28.102]) ([10.255.28.102]) by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Aug 2020 17:18:33 -0700 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] x86/kvm: Expose new features for supported cpuid To: "Luck, Tony" , Paolo Bonzini , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" Cc: "Christopherson, Sean J" , "gregkh@linuxfoundation.org" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "Hansen, Dave" , "Park, Kyung Min" , "ricardo.neri-calderon@linux.intel.com" , "vkuznets@redhat.com" , "wanpengli@tencent.com" , "jmattson@google.com" , "joro@8bytes.org" , "mingo@redhat.com" , "bp@alien8.de" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "jpoimboe@redhat.com" , "ak@linux.intel.com" , "Shankar, Ravi V" References: <1596959242-2372-1-git-send-email-cathy.zhang@intel.com> <1596959242-2372-3-git-send-email-cathy.zhang@intel.com> <27965021-2ec7-aa30-5526-5a6b293b2066@intel.com> From: "Zhang, Cathy" Message-ID: <8f5d3b35-2478-c030-e51d-3183dbcaf4a6@intel.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 08:18:32 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On 8/11/2020 7:59 AM, Luck, Tony wrote: >> As you suggest, I will split the kvm patch into two parts, SERIALIZE and >> TSXLDTRK, and this series will include three patches then, 2 kvm patches >> and 1 kernel patch. SERIALIZE could get merged into 5.9, but TSXLDTRK >> should wait for the next release. I just want to double confirm with >> you, please help correct me if I'm wrong. > Paolo is saying that he has applied the SERIALIZE part to his KVM tree. > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/virt/kvm/kvm.git/commit/?h=queue&id=43bd9ef42b3b862c97f1f4e86bf3ace890bef924 > > Next step for you is a two part series. > > Part 1: Add TSXLDTRK to cpufeatures.h > Part 2: Add TSXLDTRK to arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c (on top of the version that Paolo committed with SERIALIZE) > > Paolo: The 5.9 merge window is still open this week. Will you send the KVM serialize patch to Linus > before this merge window closes? Or do you have it queued for v5.10? > > -Tony Got it! Thanks for the explanation, Tony!