From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Sebastian Herbszt" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] BIOS changes for configuring irq0->inti2 override Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 23:38:34 +0200 Message-ID: <919A9099171C4C8DA5E9F653FEB82124@FSCPC> References: <1241471352-1642-1-git-send-email-eak@us.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Beth Kon" To: "Beth Kon" , , "Gleb Natapov" Return-path: Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:55207 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751619AbZEEVkd (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 May 2009 17:40:33 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1241471352-1642-1-git-send-email-eak@us.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Beth Kon wrote: > @@ -477,6 +480,7 @@ void wrmsr_smp(uint32_t index, uint64_t val) > #define QEMU_CFG_SIGNATURE 0x00 > #define QEMU_CFG_ID 0x01 > #define QEMU_CFG_UUID 0x02 > +#define QEMU_CFG_IRQ0_OVERRIDE 0x0e Small thing to consider before you resubmit: In his patch "read-additional-acpi-tables-from-a-vm.patch" Gleb introduced: #define QEMU_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL 0x8000 #define QEMU_CFG_ACPI_TABLES (QEMU_CFG_ARCH_LOCAL + 0) I think the idea behind this was to seperate the generic part from arch specific. The IRQ0 override seems to be arch specific (x86 only?) just like the ACPI tables, right? - Sebastian