From: "Chang S. Bae" <chang.seok.bae@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <seanjc@google.com>, <chao.gao@intel.com>, <zhao1.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v1 14/20] KVM: x86: Emulate REX2-prefixed 64-bit absolute jump
Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2025 15:27:16 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93377c7f-38ee-4458-8a6d-50a70c8cc5cb@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eb61475f-e5be-4f39-ac62-908453895ad9@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 211 bytes --]
On 11/11/2025 8:39 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> We can just add a NoRex bit and apply it to the six reows you touch in
> patch 13.
Yeah, I think that is much simple and better. Attached is the diff for
this:
[-- Attachment #2: PATCH14.diff --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 6022 bytes --]
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
index b2490e56cb71..5f36dbcec484 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/emulate.c
@@ -179,6 +179,7 @@
#define TwoMemOp ((u64)1 << 55) /* Instruction has two memory operand */
#define IsBranch ((u64)1 << 56) /* Instruction is considered a branch. */
#define ShadowStack ((u64)1 << 57) /* Instruction affects Shadow Stacks. */
+#define NoRex2 ((u64)1 << 58) /* Instruction has no use of REX2 prefix */
#define DstXacc (DstAccLo | SrcAccHi | SrcWrite)
@@ -4247,7 +4248,7 @@ static const struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
/* 0x38 - 0x3F */
I6ALU(NoWrite, em_cmp), N, N,
/* 0x40 - 0x4F */
- X8(I(DstReg, em_inc)), X8(I(DstReg, em_dec)),
+ X8(I(DstReg | NoRex2, em_inc)), X8(I(DstReg | NoRex2, em_dec)),
/* 0x50 - 0x57 */
X8(I(SrcReg | Stack, em_push)),
/* 0x58 - 0x5F */
@@ -4265,7 +4266,7 @@ static const struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
I2bvIP(DstDI | SrcDX | Mov | String | Unaligned, em_in, ins, check_perm_in), /* insb, insw/insd */
I2bvIP(SrcSI | DstDX | String, em_out, outs, check_perm_out), /* outsb, outsw/outsd */
/* 0x70 - 0x7F */
- X16(D(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch)),
+ X16(D(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2)),
/* 0x80 - 0x87 */
G(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcImm, group1),
G(DstMem | SrcImm, group1),
@@ -4289,15 +4290,15 @@ static const struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
II(ImplicitOps | Stack, em_popf, popf),
I(ImplicitOps, em_sahf), I(ImplicitOps, em_lahf),
/* 0xA0 - 0xA7 */
- I2bv(DstAcc | SrcMem | Mov | MemAbs, em_mov),
- I2bv(DstMem | SrcAcc | Mov | MemAbs | PageTable, em_mov),
- I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | Mov | String | TwoMemOp, em_mov),
- I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | String | NoWrite | TwoMemOp, em_cmp_r),
+ I2bv(DstAcc | SrcMem | Mov | MemAbs | NoRex2, em_mov),
+ I2bv(DstMem | SrcAcc | Mov | MemAbs | PageTable | NoRex2, em_mov),
+ I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | Mov | String | TwoMemOp | NoRex2, em_mov),
+ I2bv(SrcSI | DstDI | String | NoWrite | TwoMemOp | NoRex2, em_cmp_r),
/* 0xA8 - 0xAF */
- I2bv(DstAcc | SrcImm | NoWrite, em_test),
- I2bv(SrcAcc | DstDI | Mov | String, em_mov),
- I2bv(SrcSI | DstAcc | Mov | String, em_mov),
- I2bv(SrcAcc | DstDI | String | NoWrite, em_cmp_r),
+ I2bv(DstAcc | SrcImm | NoWrite | NoRex2, em_test),
+ I2bv(SrcAcc | DstDI | Mov | String | NoRex2, em_mov),
+ I2bv(SrcSI | DstAcc | Mov | String | NoRex2, em_mov),
+ I2bv(SrcAcc | DstDI | String | NoWrite | NoRex2, em_cmp_r),
/* 0xB0 - 0xB7 */
X8(I(ByteOp | DstReg | SrcImm | Mov, em_mov)),
/* 0xB8 - 0xBF */
@@ -4327,17 +4328,17 @@ static const struct opcode opcode_table[256] = {
/* 0xD8 - 0xDF */
N, E(0, &escape_d9), N, E(0, &escape_db), N, E(0, &escape_dd), N, N,
/* 0xE0 - 0xE7 */
- X3(I(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch, em_loop)),
- I(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch, em_jcxz),
- I2bvIP(SrcImmUByte | DstAcc, em_in, in, check_perm_in),
- I2bvIP(SrcAcc | DstImmUByte, em_out, out, check_perm_out),
+ X3(I(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2, em_loop)),
+ I(SrcImmByte | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2, em_jcxz),
+ I2bvIP(SrcImmUByte | DstAcc | NoRex2, em_in, in, check_perm_in),
+ I2bvIP(SrcAcc | DstImmUByte | NoRex2, em_out, out, check_perm_out),
/* 0xE8 - 0xEF */
- I(SrcImm | NearBranch | IsBranch | ShadowStack, em_call),
- D(SrcImm | ImplicitOps | NearBranch | IsBranch),
- I(SrcImmFAddr | No64 | IsBranch, em_jmp_far),
- D(SrcImmByte | ImplicitOps | NearBranch | IsBranch),
- I2bvIP(SrcDX | DstAcc, em_in, in, check_perm_in),
- I2bvIP(SrcAcc | DstDX, em_out, out, check_perm_out),
+ I(SrcImm | NearBranch | IsBranch | ShadowStack | NoRex2, em_call),
+ D(SrcImm | ImplicitOps | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2),
+ I(SrcImmFAddr | No64 | IsBranch | NoRex2, em_jmp_far),
+ D(SrcImmByte | ImplicitOps | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2),
+ I2bvIP(SrcDX | DstAcc | NoRex2, em_in, in, check_perm_in),
+ I2bvIP(SrcAcc | DstDX | NoRex2, em_out, out, check_perm_out),
/* 0xF0 - 0xF7 */
N, DI(ImplicitOps, icebp), N, N,
DI(ImplicitOps | Priv, hlt), D(ImplicitOps),
@@ -4378,12 +4379,12 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, GP(ModRM | DstMem | SrcReg | Mov | Sse, &pfx_0f_2b),
N, N, N, N,
/* 0x30 - 0x3F */
- II(ImplicitOps | Priv, em_wrmsr, wrmsr),
- IIP(ImplicitOps, em_rdtsc, rdtsc, check_rdtsc),
- II(ImplicitOps | Priv, em_rdmsr, rdmsr),
- IIP(ImplicitOps, em_rdpmc, rdpmc, check_rdpmc),
- I(ImplicitOps | EmulateOnUD | IsBranch | ShadowStack, em_sysenter),
- I(ImplicitOps | Priv | EmulateOnUD | IsBranch | ShadowStack, em_sysexit),
+ II(ImplicitOps | Priv | NoRex2, em_wrmsr, wrmsr),
+ IIP(ImplicitOps | NoRex2, em_rdtsc, rdtsc, check_rdtsc),
+ II(ImplicitOps | Priv | NoRex2, em_rdmsr, rdmsr),
+ IIP(ImplicitOps | NoRex2, em_rdpmc, rdpmc, check_rdpmc),
+ I(ImplicitOps | EmulateOnUD | IsBranch | ShadowStack | NoRex2, em_sysenter),
+ I(ImplicitOps | Priv | EmulateOnUD | IsBranch | ShadowStack | NoRex2, em_sysexit),
N, N,
N, N, N, N, N, N, N, N,
/* 0x40 - 0x4F */
@@ -4401,7 +4402,7 @@ static const struct opcode twobyte_table[256] = {
N, N, N, N,
N, N, N, GP(SrcReg | DstMem | ModRM | Mov, &pfx_0f_6f_0f_7f),
/* 0x80 - 0x8F */
- X16(D(SrcImm | NearBranch | IsBranch)),
+ X16(D(SrcImm | NearBranch | IsBranch | NoRex2)),
/* 0x90 - 0x9F */
X16(D(ByteOp | DstMem | SrcNone | ModRM| Mov)),
/* 0xA0 - 0xA7 */
@@ -4888,7 +4889,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
if (ctxt->b == 0x0f) {
/* Escape byte: start two-byte opcode sequence */
ctxt->b = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
- if (ctxt->b == 0x38) {
+ if (ctxt->b == 0x38 && ctxt->rex_prefix != REX2_PREFIX) {
/* Three-byte opcode */
ctxt->opcode_len = 3;
ctxt->b = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
@@ -4905,6 +4906,9 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len, int
}
ctxt->d = opcode.flags;
+ if (ctxt->d & NoRex2 && ctxt->rex_prefix == REX2_PREFIX)
+ ctxt->d = Undefined;
+
if (ctxt->d & ModRM)
ctxt->modrm = insn_fetch(u8, ctxt);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-13 23:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-10 18:01 [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 01/20] KVM: x86: Rename register accessors to be GPR-specific Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 02/20] KVM: x86: Refactor GPR accessors to differentiate register access types Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:19 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:11 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:18 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 03/20] KVM: x86: Implement accessors for extended GPRs Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 04/20] KVM: VMX: Introduce unified instruction info structure Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 05/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor instruction information retrieval Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 06/20] KVM: VMX: Refactor GPR index retrieval from exit qualification Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 07/20] KVM: nVMX: Support the extended instruction info field Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-12 1:54 ` Chao Gao
2025-11-13 23:21 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-17 23:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-18 1:39 ` Chao Gao
2025-11-18 10:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:20 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 08/20] KVM: VMX: Support extended register index in exit handling Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:22 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:40 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 09/20] KVM: x86: Support EGPR accessing and tracking for instruction emulation Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 10/20] KVM: x86: Refactor REX prefix handling in " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:23 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 11/20] KVM: x86: Refactor opcode table lookup " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:24 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 12/20] KVM: x86: Support REX2-extended register index in the decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:26 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:53 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 13/20] KVM: x86: Add REX2 opcode tables to the instruction decoder Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 14/20] KVM: x86: Emulate REX2-prefixed 64-bit absolute jump Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:39 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:27 ` Chang S. Bae [this message]
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 15/20] KVM: x86: Reject EVEX-prefix instructions in the emulator Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:28 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 16/20] KVM: x86: Decode REX2 prefix " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 17:55 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:30 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-13 23:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-17 20:01 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-17 23:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 17/20] KVM: x86: Prepare APX state setting in XCR0 Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 16:59 ` Paolo Bonzini
2025-11-13 23:32 ` Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 18/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX foundational feature bit to guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 19/20] KVM: x86: Expose APX sub-features " Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:01 ` [PATCH RFC v1 20/20] KVM: selftests: Add APX state handling and XCR0 sanity checks Chang S. Bae
2025-11-10 18:50 ` [PATCH RFC v1 00/20] KVM: x86: Support APX feature for guests Chang S. Bae
2025-11-11 18:14 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93377c7f-38ee-4458-8a6d-50a70c8cc5cb@intel.com \
--to=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=zhao1.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox