From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Jinrong Liang <cloudliang@tencent.com>,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>, Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 19/19] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2023 15:51:21 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93a3da96-2e36-4ee9-a384-9dcc28c9f4ba@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231108003135.546002-20-seanjc@google.com>
On 11/8/2023 8:31 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Extend the PMC counters test to use forced emulation to verify that KVM
> emulates counter events for instructions retired and branches retired.
> Force emulation for only a subset of the measured code to test that KVM
> does the right thing when mixing perf events with emulated events.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
> ---
> .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c | 44 +++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> index d775cc7e8fab..09332b3c0a69 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/pmu_counters_test.c
> @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
>
> static uint8_t kvm_pmu_version;
> static bool kvm_has_perf_caps;
> +static bool is_forced_emulation_enabled;
>
> static struct kvm_vm *pmu_vm_create_with_one_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu,
> void *guest_code,
> @@ -34,6 +35,7 @@ static struct kvm_vm *pmu_vm_create_with_one_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu **vcpu,
> vcpu_init_descriptor_tables(*vcpu);
>
> sync_global_to_guest(vm, kvm_pmu_version);
> + sync_global_to_guest(vm, is_forced_emulation_enabled);
>
> /*
> * Set PERF_CAPABILITIES before PMU version as KVM disallows enabling
> @@ -138,37 +140,50 @@ static void guest_assert_event_count(uint8_t idx,
> * If CLFUSH{,OPT} is supported, flush the cacheline containing (at least) the
> * start of the loop to force LLC references and misses, i.e. to allow testing
> * that those events actually count.
> + *
> + * If forced emulation is enabled (and specified), force emulation on a subset
> + * of the measured code to verify that KVM correctly emulates instructions and
> + * branches retired events in conjunction with hardware also counting said
> + * events.
> */
> -#define GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_msr, _value, clflush) \
> +#define GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_msr, _value, clflush, FEP) \
> do { \
> __asm__ __volatile__("wrmsr\n\t" \
> clflush "\n\t" \
> "mfence\n\t" \
> "1: mov $" __stringify(NUM_BRANCHES) ", %%ecx\n\t" \
> - "loop .\n\t" \
> - "mov %%edi, %%ecx\n\t" \
> - "xor %%eax, %%eax\n\t" \
> - "xor %%edx, %%edx\n\t" \
> + FEP "loop .\n\t" \
> + FEP "mov %%edi, %%ecx\n\t" \
> + FEP "xor %%eax, %%eax\n\t" \
> + FEP "xor %%edx, %%edx\n\t" \
> "wrmsr\n\t" \
> :: "a"((uint32_t)_value), "d"(_value >> 32), \
> "c"(_msr), "D"(_msr) \
> ); \
> } while (0)
>
> +#define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _event, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \
> +do { \
> + wrmsr(pmc_msr, 0); \
> + \
> + if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT)) \
> + GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflushopt 1f", FEP); \
> + else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH)) \
> + GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflush 1f", FEP); \
> + else \
> + GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "nop", FEP); \
> + \
> + guest_assert_event_count(_idx, _event, _pmc, _pmc_msr); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> static void __guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx, struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature event,
> uint32_t pmc, uint32_t pmc_msr,
> uint32_t ctrl_msr, uint64_t ctrl_msr_value)
> {
> - wrmsr(pmc_msr, 0);
> + GUEST_TEST_EVENT(idx, event, pmc, pmc_msr, ctrl_msr, ctrl_msr_value, "");
>
> - if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT))
> - GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(ctrl_msr, ctrl_msr_value, "clflushopt 1f");
> - else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH))
> - GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(ctrl_msr, ctrl_msr_value, "clflush 1f");
> - else
> - GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(ctrl_msr, ctrl_msr_value, "nop");
> -
> - guest_assert_event_count(idx, event, pmc, pmc_msr);
> + if (is_forced_emulation_enabled)
> + GUEST_TEST_EVENT(idx, event, pmc, pmc_msr, ctrl_msr, ctrl_msr_value, KVM_FEP);
> }
>
> #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL \
> @@ -545,6 +560,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
>
> kvm_pmu_version = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
> kvm_has_perf_caps = kvm_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM);
> + is_forced_emulation_enabled = kvm_is_forced_emulation_enabled();
>
> test_intel_counters();
>
Reviewed-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-09 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-08 0:31 [PATCH v7 00/19] KVM: x86/pmu: selftests: Fixes and new tests Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 01/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Always treat Fixed counters as available when supported Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 02/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Allow programming events that match unsupported arch events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:24 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 20:41 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 03/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Remove KVM's enumeration of Intel's architectural encodings Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 16:06 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 19:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 20:38 ` Liang, Kan
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 04/19] KVM: x86/pmu: Setup fixed counters' eventsel during PMU initialization Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 1:28 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 14:39 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:00 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 05/19] KVM: selftests: Add vcpu_set_cpuid_property() to set properties Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 19:11 ` Jim Mattson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 06/19] KVM: selftests: Drop the "name" param from KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE() Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 07/19] KVM: selftests: Extend {kvm,this}_pmu_has() to support fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 08/19] KVM: selftests: Add pmu.h and lib/pmu.c for common PMU assets Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 09/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:28 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 10/19] KVM: selftests: Test Intel PMU architectural events on fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:30 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:23 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 11/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of gp counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 12/19] KVM: selftests: Test consistency of CPUID with num of fixed counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:34 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-09 15:19 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 13/19] KVM: selftests: Add functional test for Intel's fixed PMU counters Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:39 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 14/19] KVM: selftests: Expand PMU counters test to verify LLC events Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:43 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 15/19] KVM: selftests: Add a helper to query if the PMU module param is enabled Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:45 ` Mi, Dapeng
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 16/19] KVM: selftests: Add helpers to read integer module params Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 17/19] KVM: selftests: Query module param to detect FEP in MSR filtering test Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 18/19] KVM: selftests: Move KVM_FEP macro into common library header Sean Christopherson
2023-11-08 0:31 ` [PATCH v7 19/19] KVM: selftests: Test PMC virtualization with forced emulation Sean Christopherson
2023-11-09 7:51 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93a3da96-2e36-4ee9-a384-9dcc28c9f4ba@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=cloudliang@tencent.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=likexu@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox