From: "Mi, Dapeng" <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
To: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Das Sandipan <Sandipan.Das@amd.com>,
Shukla Manali <Manali.Shukla@amd.com>,
Falcon Thomas <thomas.falcon@intel.com>,
Xudong Hao <xudong.hao@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add perf_metrics and fixed counter 3 tests
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2026 10:26:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9bad0de9-18ab-422d-b020-9b08d8e10296@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260423174639.56149-5-zide.chen@intel.com>
On 4/24/2026 1:46 AM, Zide Chen wrote:
> Add a selftest to exercise IA32_PERF_METRICS, i.e. architectural
> support for Topdown (TMA) Level 1 metrics, enumerated by
> IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES[15].
>
> Only check for non-zero metrics, as they are derived and depend on
> the workload, CPU model, and host scheduling, making precise
> expectations fragile.
>
> Extend the PMU selftest to cover Intel fixed counter 3 by bumping
> MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS to 4 and validating basic functionality.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zide Chen <zide.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> V2: New patch.
> ---
> tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 1 +
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h | 3 +
> .../selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++--
> 3 files changed, 70 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> index 6673601246b3..31ecbea42459 100644
> --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h
> @@ -331,6 +331,7 @@
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT 0xf00
> #define PERF_CAP_FW_WRITES BIT_ULL(13)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE BIT_ULL(14)
> +#define PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS BIT_ULL(15)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_TIMING_INFO BIT_ULL(17)
> #define PERF_CAP_PEBS_MASK (PERF_CAP_PEBS_TRAP | PERF_CAP_ARCH_REG | \
> PERF_CAP_PEBS_FORMAT | PERF_CAP_PEBS_BASELINE | \
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
> index 72575eadb63a..c68d6435422c 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
> @@ -46,6 +46,9 @@
> /* Fixed PMC controls, Intel only. */
> #define FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(_idx) BIT_ULL((32 + (_idx)))
>
> +/* PERF_METRICS enable, Intel only. */
> +#define PERF_METRICS_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE BIT_ULL(48)
> +
> #define FIXED_PMC_KERNEL BIT_ULL(0)
> #define FIXED_PMC_USER BIT_ULL(1)
> #define FIXED_PMC_ANYTHREAD BIT_ULL(2)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
> index 3eaa216b96c0..240bcf9184c2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>
> #include "pmu.h"
> #include "processor.h"
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
>
> /* Number of iterations of the loop for the guest measurement payload. */
> #define NUM_LOOPS 10
> @@ -241,17 +242,20 @@ do { \
> ); \
> } while (0)
>
> -#define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \
> +#define GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(_ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \
> do { \
> - wrmsr(_pmc_msr, 0); \
> - \
> if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSHOPT)) \
> GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflushopt %[m]", FEP); \
> else if (this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_CLFLUSH)) \
> GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "clflush %[m]", FEP); \
> else \
> GUEST_MEASURE_EVENT(_ctrl_msr, _value, "nop", FEP); \
> - \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#define GUEST_TEST_EVENT(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr, _ctrl_msr, _value, FEP) \
> +do { \
> + wrmsr(_pmc_msr, 0); \
> + GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(_ctrl_msr, _value, FEP); \
> guest_assert_event_count(_idx, _pmc, _pmc_msr); \
> } while (0)
>
> @@ -318,6 +322,55 @@ static void guest_test_arch_event(uint8_t idx)
> FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(i));
> }
>
> +static void guest_test_perf_metrics(void)
> +{
> + int retiring, bad_spec, fe_bound, be_bound;
> + uint64_t global_ctrl, metrics;
> +
> + if ((guest_get_pmu_version() < 2) || /* Does guest has GLOBAL_CTRL? */
> + !this_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PDCM) ||
> + !(rdmsr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES) & PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS))
> + return;
> +
> + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, 0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR3, 0);
> + wrmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0);
> +
> + /* Enable fixed ctr3 (TOPDOWN.SLOTS) and PERF_METRICS . */
> + wrmsr(MSR_CORE_PERF_FIXED_CTR_CTRL, FIXED_PMC_CTRL(3, FIXED_PMC_KERNEL));
> + global_ctrl = FIXED_PMC_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE(3) |
> + PERF_METRICS_GLOBAL_CTRL_ENABLE;
> +
> + GUEST_RUN_PAYLOAD(MSR_CORE_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL, global_ctrl, "");
> +
> + /* Check test results. */
> + metrics = rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS);
> + retiring = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(7, 0), metrics);
> + bad_spec = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(15, 8), metrics);
> + fe_bound = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(23, 16), metrics);
> + be_bound = FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(31, 24), metrics);
> +
> + /*
> + * Be conservative: the measured payload definitely retires work, so
> + * Retiring should be non-zero.
> + */
> + GUEST_ASSERT_NE(metrics, 0ULL);
> + GUEST_ASSERT_NE(retiring, 0ULL);
> +
> + /*
> + * The derived percentage of the metrics should be close to 100%.
Better say "The sum of the 4 level-1 topdown metrics should be close to
100%" which is preciser.
Thanks.
> + * 3 is chosen as a loose sanity check.
> + */
> + GUEST_ASSERT(abs(retiring + bad_spec + fe_bound + be_bound - 0xff) < 3);
> +
> + /* Sanity check after PERF_METRICS disabled. */
> + __asm__ __volatile__("loop ." : "+c"((int){NUM_LOOPS}));
> + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS), metrics);
> + wrmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS, 0xdeaddead);
> +
> + GUEST_ASSERT_EQ(rdmsr(MSR_PERF_METRICS), 0xdeaddead);
> +}
> +
> static void guest_test_arch_events(void)
> {
> uint8_t i;
> @@ -325,6 +378,8 @@ static void guest_test_arch_events(void)
> for (i = 0; i < NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS; i++)
> guest_test_arch_event(i);
>
> + guest_test_perf_metrics();
> +
> GUEST_DONE();
> }
>
> @@ -361,7 +416,7 @@ static void test_arch_events(uint8_t pmu_version, uint64_t perf_capabilities,
> * other than PMCs in the future.
> */
> #define MAX_NR_GP_COUNTERS 8
> -#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS 3
> +#define MAX_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS 4
>
> #define GUEST_ASSERT_PMC_MSR_ACCESS(insn, msr, expect_gp, vector) \
> __GUEST_ASSERT(expect_gp ? vector == GP_VECTOR : !vector, \
> @@ -586,6 +641,7 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void)
> uint8_t nr_fixed_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS);
> uint8_t nr_gp_counters = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS);
> uint8_t pmu_version = kvm_cpu_property(X86_PROPERTY_PMU_VERSION);
> + uint64_t advertised_perf_caps = kvm_get_feature_msr(MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES);
> unsigned int i;
> uint8_t v, j;
> uint32_t k;
> @@ -593,6 +649,7 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void)
> const uint64_t perf_caps[] = {
> 0,
> PMU_CAP_FW_WRITES,
> + PERF_CAP_PERF_METRICS,
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -650,6 +707,10 @@ static void test_intel_counters(void)
> if (!kvm_has_perf_caps && perf_caps[i])
> continue;
>
> + /* Ignore unsupported features. */
> + if (perf_caps[i] & ~advertised_perf_caps)
> + continue;
> +
> pr_info("Testing arch events, PMU version %u, perf_caps = %lx\n",
> v, perf_caps[i]);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-30 2:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 17:46 [PATCH V2 0/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Add hardware Topdown metrics support Zide Chen
2026-04-23 17:46 ` [PATCH V2 1/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Do not map fixed counters >= 3 to generic perf events Zide Chen
2026-04-30 1:55 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-23 17:46 ` [PATCH V2 2/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Support Intel fixed counter 3 on mediated vPMU Zide Chen
2026-04-30 2:19 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-30 17:54 ` Chen, Zide
2026-04-23 17:46 ` [PATCH V2 3/4] KVM: x86/pmu: Support PERF_METRICS MSR in " Zide Chen
2026-04-30 2:22 ` Mi, Dapeng
2026-04-23 17:46 ` [PATCH V2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Add perf_metrics and fixed counter 3 tests Zide Chen
2026-04-30 2:26 ` Mi, Dapeng [this message]
2026-04-30 18:13 ` Chen, Zide
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9bad0de9-18ab-422d-b020-9b08d8e10296@linux.intel.com \
--to=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Manali.Shukla@amd.com \
--cc=Sandipan.Das@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.falcon@intel.com \
--cc=xudong.hao@intel.com \
--cc=zide.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox