public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Yang, Weijiang" <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"jmattson@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
	"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
	"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"like.xu.linux@gmail.com" <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>,
	"vkuznets@redhat.com" <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	"Wang, Wei W" <wei.w.wang@intel.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 14/16] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 15:43:09 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9e2b5e9f-25a2-b724-c6d7-282dc987aa99@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9f19a5eb-3eb0-58a2-e4ee-612f3298ba82@redhat.com>


On 5/10/2022 11:51 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 5/6/22 05:33, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>> Per spec:"IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is saved and cleared on #SMI, and restored
>> on RSM. On a warm reset, all LBR MSRs, including IA32_LBR_DEPTH, have their
>> values preserved. However, IA32_LBR_CTL.LBREn is cleared to 0, disabling
>> LBRs." So clear Arch LBREn bit on #SMI and restore it on RSM manully, also
>> clear the bit when guest does warm reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
>> ---
>>    arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 4 ++++
>>    1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> index 6d6ee9cf82f5..b38f58868905 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
>> @@ -4593,6 +4593,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>>    	if (!init_event) {
>>    		if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR))
>>    			vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
>> +	} else {
>> +		flip_arch_lbr_ctl(vcpu, false);
>>    	}
>>    }
>>    
>> @@ -7704,6 +7706,7 @@ static int vmx_enter_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, char *smstate)
>>    	vmx->nested.smm.vmxon = vmx->nested.vmxon;
>>    	vmx->nested.vmxon = false;
>>    	vmx_clear_hlt(vcpu);
>> +	flip_arch_lbr_ctl(vcpu, false);
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>>    
>> @@ -7725,6 +7728,7 @@ static int vmx_leave_smm(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const char *smstate)
>>    		vmx->nested.nested_run_pending = 1;
>>    		vmx->nested.smm.guest_mode = false;
>>    	}
>> +	flip_arch_lbr_ctl(vcpu, true);
>>    	return 0;
>>    }
>>    
> This is incorrect, you hare not saving/restoring the actual value of
> LBREn (which is "lbr_desc->event != NULL").  Therefore, a migration
> while in SMM would lose the value of LBREn = true.
>
> Instead of using flip_arch_lbr_ctl, SMM should save the value of the MSR
> in kvm_x86_ops->enter_smm, and restore it in kvm_x86_ops->leave_smm
> (feel free to do it only if guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_LM), i.e.
> the 32-bit case can be ignored).

In the case of migration in SMM, I assume kvm_x86_ops->enter_smm() 
called in source side

and kvm_x86_ops->leave_smm() is called at destination, then should the 
saved LBREn be transferred

to destination too? The destination can rely on the bit to defer setting 
LBREn bit in

VMCS until kvm_x86_ops->leave_smm() is called. is it good? thanks!

>   
>
> Paolo

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-11  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-06  3:32 [PATCH v11 00/16] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 01/16] perf/x86/intel: Fix the comment about guest LBR support on KVM Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 02/16] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 03/16] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 04/16] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 05/16] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 06/16] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 14:39   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 07/16] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 14:42   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 08/16] KVM: x86/pmu: Refactor code to support " Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 15:03   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-07  2:32     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-09 14:06       ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 09/16] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:32 ` [PATCH v11 10/16] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 11/16] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 12/16] KVM: nVMX: Add necessary Arch LBR settings for nested VM Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 13/16] KVM: x86/vmx: Clear Arch LBREn bit before inject #DB to guest Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 15:08   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 14/16] KVM: x86/vmx: Flip Arch LBREn bit on guest state change Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 15:08   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-10 15:51   ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-11  7:43     ` Yang, Weijiang [this message]
2022-05-12 13:18       ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-12 14:38         ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-13  4:02         ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-17  8:56           ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-17  9:01             ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-17 11:31               ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-12  6:44     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 15/16] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 15:11   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-06  3:33 ` [PATCH v11 16/16] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-05-06 15:13   ` Liang, Kan
2022-05-10 15:55 ` [PATCH v11 00/16] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-11  0:29   ` Yang, Weijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9e2b5e9f-25a2-b724-c6d7-282dc987aa99@intel.com \
    --to=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox