From: "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@intel.com>
To: "pbonzini@redhat.com" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: "thomas.lendacky@amd.com" <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Li, Xiaoyao" <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Prep KVM hypercall handling for TDX
Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2024 01:06:56 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9fc1bc289254af9953e1a65ea7573facd0b54ac6.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241128004344.4072099-1-seanjc@google.com>
On Wed, 2024-11-27 at 16:43 -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> Effectively v4 of Binbin's series to handle hypercall exits to userspace in
> a generic manner, so that TDX
>
> Binbin and Kai, this is fairly different that what we last discussed. While
> sorting through Binbin's latest patch, I stumbled on what I think/hope is an
> approach that will make life easier for TDX. Rather than have common code
> set the return value, _and_ have TDX implement a callback to do the same for
> user return MSRs, just use the callback for all paths.
>
> As for abusing vcpu->run->hypercall.ret... It's obviously a bit gross, but
> I think it's a lesser evil than having multiple a one-line wrappers just to
> trampoline in the return code.
Doesn't seem to be "gross" to me, and AFAICT now for TDX we just need to play
with __kvm_emulate_hypercall() with a TDX-specific completion callback.
Which is nice. Thanks!
For this series:
Reviewed-by: Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-28 1:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-28 0:43 [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Prep KVM hypercall handling for TDX Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] KVM: x86: Play nice with protected guests in complete_hypercall_exit() Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:22 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-11-29 9:01 ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2024-12-02 18:54 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:29 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: x86: Add a helper to check for user interception of KVM hypercalls Sean Christopherson
2024-12-02 18:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] KVM: x86: Move "emulate hypercall" function declarations to x86.h Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:23 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 20:05 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:33 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] KVM: x86: Bump hypercall stat prior to fully completing hypercall Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:24 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 20:13 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:33 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 7:37 ` Binbin Wu
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] KVM: x86: Always complete hypercall via function callback Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 3:08 ` Xiaoyao Li
2024-12-02 18:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-02 20:57 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-02 20:59 ` Tom Lendacky
2024-12-03 0:14 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 0:43 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] KVM: x86: Refactor __kvm_emulate_hypercall() into a macro Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 8:38 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-12-10 16:20 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-10 20:03 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-12 7:32 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-12-12 15:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-12 18:40 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-12-03 8:01 ` Binbin Wu
2024-12-10 16:17 ` Paolo Bonzini
2024-12-10 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-11-28 1:06 ` Huang, Kai [this message]
2024-12-19 2:40 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] KVM: x86: Prep KVM hypercall handling for TDX Sean Christopherson
2025-01-15 9:40 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-17 19:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-01-20 0:37 ` Binbin Wu
2025-01-21 18:04 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9fc1bc289254af9953e1a65ea7573facd0b54ac6.camel@intel.com \
--to=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox