From: Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues <lmr@redhat.com>
To: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
Cc: autotest@test.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Autotest] [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Simple stop/continue test
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:05:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=H9zx7cBoNbcJ-e7dDYCZdBG9QOQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110421062112.9564.51395.stgit@t>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com> wrote:
> Change guest state by monitor cmd, verify guest status,
> and try to login guest by network.
I don't like the way you're handling human monitor and QMP monitors in
this tests... comments below:
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Amos Kong <akong@redhat.com>
> ---
> client/tests/kvm/tests/stop_continue.py | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> client/tests/kvm/tests_base.cfg.sample | 4 ++
> 2 files changed, 56 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 client/tests/kvm/tests/stop_continue.py
>
> diff --git a/client/tests/kvm/tests/stop_continue.py b/client/tests/kvm/tests/stop_continue.py
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..c7d8025
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/client/tests/kvm/tests/stop_continue.py
> @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
> +import logging
> +from autotest_lib.client.common_lib import error
> +
> +
> +def run_stop_continue(test, params, env):
> + """
> + Suspend a running Virtual Machine and verify its state.
> +
> + 1) Boot the vm
> + 2) Suspend the vm through stop command
> + 3) Verify the state through info status command
> + 4) Check is the ssh session to guest is still responsive,
> + if succeed, fail the test.
> +
> + @param test: Kvm test object
> + @param params: Dictionary with the test parameters
> + @param env: Dictionary with test environment.
> + """
> + vm = env.get_vm(params["main_vm"])
> + vm.verify_alive()
> + timeout = float(params.get("login_timeout", 240))
> + session = vm.wait_for_login(timeout=timeout)
> +
> + try:
> + logging.info("Suspend the virtual machine")
> + vm.monitor.cmd("stop")
> +
> + logging.info("Verifying the status of virtual machine through monitor")
> + o = vm.monitor.info("status")
> + if 'paused' not in o and ( "u'running': False" not in str(o)):
^ Here, it's not clear what means a paused qmp monitor or a hmp
monitor. this statement is unnecessarily confusing. Here
'paused' not in o -> Is what would define a 'not paused hmp monitor'
"u'running': False" not in str(o) -> This defines a 'not paused qmp monitor'
why we are checking one _and_ the other, as one monitor can't be hmp
and qmp at the same time? It would be at least _or_. And like I said,
it's non trivial to flow this assertion made.
It seems to me that a better (although involving more code changes) approach is:
1) Introduce VM methods is_paused and verify_paused, which would
internally for the kvm vm class, call monitor methods also called
is_paused and verify_paused, with implementations for both hmp and
qmp. verify_paused would throw an exception in case of a failure,
while is_paused would return a boolean.
> + logging.error(o)
> + raise error.TestFail("Fail to suspend through monitor command line")
> +
> + logging.info("Check the session responsiveness")
> + if session.is_responsive():
> + raise error.TestFail("Session is still responsive after stop")
> +
> + logging.info("Try to resume the guest")
> + vm.monitor.cmd("cont")
> +
> + o = vm.monitor.info("status")
> + m_type = params.get("monitor_type", "human")
> + if ('human' in m_type and 'running' not in o) or\
> + ('qmp' in m_type and "u'running': True" not in str(o)):
^ same here, we should have is_running and verify_running methods on
VM that would call monitor methods with the same names.
Now, of course I might be really mistaken here, would like to hear
your opinion on that subject.
--
Lucas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-29 5:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-21 6:21 [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Simple stop/continue test Amos Kong
2011-04-29 5:05 ` Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues [this message]
2011-05-06 15:03 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM-test: introduce a verify_status method Amos Kong
2011-05-06 15:03 ` [PATCH 2/3] KVM-test: Simple stop/continue test Amos Kong
2011-05-06 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] KVM-test: Check if guest bootable after reseting several times Amos Kong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='BANLkTi=H9zx7cBoNbcJ-e7dDYCZdBG9QOQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=lmr@redhat.com \
--cc=akong@redhat.com \
--cc=autotest@test.kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).