kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
To: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org,  pbonzini@redhat.com, chenhuacai@kernel.org,
	mpe@ellerman.id.au,  anup@brainfault.org,
	paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@dabbelt.com,
	 aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, seanjc@google.com,
	viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,  brauner@kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	 xiaoyao.li@intel.com, yilun.xu@intel.com,
	chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com,  jarkko@kernel.org,
	amoorthy@google.com, dmatlack@google.com,
	 isaku.yamahata@intel.com, mic@digikod.net, vbabka@suse.cz,
	 vannapurve@google.com, ackerleytng@google.com,
	mail@maciej.szmigiero.name,  david@redhat.com,
	michael.roth@amd.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	 liam.merwick@oracle.com, isaku.yamahata@gmail.com,
	 kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
	steven.price@arm.com,  quic_eberman@quicinc.com,
	quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com, quic_tsoni@quicinc.com,
	 quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com, quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com,
	 quic_pderrin@quicinc.com, quic_pheragu@quicinc.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com,  james.morse@arm.com,
	yuzenghui@huawei.com, oliver.upton@linux.dev,  maz@kernel.org,
	will@kernel.org, qperret@google.com, keirf@google.com,
	 roypat@amazon.co.uk, shuah@kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	jgg@nvidia.com,  rientjes@google.com, jhubbard@nvidia.com,
	fvdl@google.com, hughd@google.com,  jthoughton@google.com,
	peterx@redhat.com, pankaj.gupta@amd.com,  ira.weiny@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/17] KVM: x86: Compute max_mapping_level with input from guest_memfd
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 08:24:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+EHjTwc9d6QJykgp5CuBga7JMzzTpaJOhB+5RoqvrRg2kgbbA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55215c60-f071-474b-a0d5-06f27bc97d32@amd.com>

On Wed, 14 May 2025 at 08:14, Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/13/2025 10:04 PM, Fuad Tabba wrote:
> > From: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> >
> > This patch adds kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(), which always returns
> > PG_LEVEL_4K since guest_memfd only supports 4K pages for now.
> >
> > When guest_memfd supports shared memory, max_mapping_level (especially
> > when recovering huge pages - see call to __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level()
> > from recover_huge_pages_range()) should take input from
> > guest_memfd.
> >
> > Input from guest_memfd should be taken in these cases:
> >
> > + if the memslot supports shared memory (guest_memfd is used for
> >   shared memory, or in future both shared and private memory) or
> > + if the memslot is only used for private memory and that gfn is
> >   private.
> >
> > If the memslot doesn't use guest_memfd, figure out the
> > max_mapping_level using the host page tables like before.
> >
> > This patch also refactors and inlines the other call to
> > __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level().
> >
> > In kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(), guest_memfd's input is already
> > provided (if applicable) in fault->max_level. Hence, there is no need
> > to query guest_memfd.
> >
> > lpage_info is queried like before, and then if the fault is not from
> > guest_memfd, adjust fault->req_level based on input from host page
> > tables.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@google.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c   | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> >  include/linux/kvm_host.h |  7 +++
> >  virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c   | 12 ++++++
> >  3 files changed, 79 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > index cfbb471f7c70..9e0bc8114859 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
> > @@ -3256,12 +3256,11 @@ static int host_pfn_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn,
> >       return level;
> >  }
> >
> > -static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
> > -                                    const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > -                                    gfn_t gfn, int max_level, bool is_private)
> > +static int kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
> > +                                         const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +                                         gfn_t gfn, int max_level)
> >  {
> >       struct kvm_lpage_info *linfo;
> > -     int host_level;
> >
> >       max_level = min(max_level, max_huge_page_level);
> >       for ( ; max_level > PG_LEVEL_4K; max_level--) {
> > @@ -3270,23 +3269,61 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                       break;
> >       }
> >
> > -     if (is_private)
> > -             return max_level;
> > +     return max_level;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
> > +{
> > +     BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G);
> > +
> > +     KVM_MMU_WARN_ON(order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G) &&
> > +                     order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M) &&
> > +                     order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_4K));
> > +
> > +     if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G))
> > +             return PG_LEVEL_1G;
> > +
> > +     if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M))
> > +             return PG_LEVEL_2M;
> > +
> > +     return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +                                          gfn_t gfn, int max_level)
> > +{
> > +     int max_order;
> >
> >       if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> >               return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> >
> > -     host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot);
> > -     return min(host_level, max_level);
> > +     max_order = kvm_gmem_mapping_order(slot, gfn);
> > +     return min(max_level, kvm_max_level_for_order(max_order));
> >  }
> >
> >  int kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                             const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> >  {
> > -     bool is_private = kvm_slot_has_gmem(slot) &&
> > -                       kvm_mem_is_private(kvm, gfn);
> > +     int max_level;
> > +
> > +     max_level = kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM);
> > +     if (max_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> > +             return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> >
> > -     return __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(kvm, slot, gfn, PG_LEVEL_NUM, is_private);
> > +     if (kvm_slot_has_gmem(slot) &&
> > +         (kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(slot) ||
> > +          kvm_get_memory_attributes(kvm, gfn) & KVM_MEMORY_ATTRIBUTE_PRIVATE)) {
> > +             return kvm_gmem_max_mapping_level(slot, gfn, max_level);
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     return min(max_level, host_pfn_mapping_level(kvm, gfn, slot));
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline bool fault_from_gmem(struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> > +{
> > +     return fault->is_private ||
> > +            (kvm_slot_has_gmem(fault->slot) &&
> > +             kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(fault->slot));
> >  }
> >
> >  void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault)
> > @@ -3309,12 +3346,20 @@ void kvm_mmu_hugepage_adjust(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_page_fault *fault
> >        * Enforce the iTLB multihit workaround after capturing the requested
> >        * level, which will be used to do precise, accurate accounting.
> >        */
> > -     fault->req_level = __kvm_mmu_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, slot,
> > -                                                    fault->gfn, fault->max_level,
> > -                                                    fault->is_private);
> > +     fault->req_level = kvm_lpage_info_max_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, slot,
> > +                                                         fault->gfn, fault->max_level);
> >       if (fault->req_level == PG_LEVEL_4K || fault->huge_page_disallowed)
> >               return;
> >
> > +     if (!fault_from_gmem(fault)) {
> > +             int host_level;
> > +
> > +             host_level = host_pfn_mapping_level(vcpu->kvm, fault->gfn, slot);
> > +             fault->req_level = min(fault->req_level, host_level);
> > +             if (fault->req_level == PG_LEVEL_4K)
> > +                     return;
> > +     }
> > +
> >       /*
> >        * mmu_invalidate_retry() was successful and mmu_lock is held, so
> >        * the pmd can't be split from under us.
> > @@ -4448,23 +4493,6 @@ void kvm_arch_async_page_ready(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_async_pf *work)
> >               vcpu->stat.pf_fixed++;
> >  }
> >
> > -static inline u8 kvm_max_level_for_order(int order)
> > -{
> > -     BUILD_BUG_ON(KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL > PG_LEVEL_1G);
> > -
> > -     KVM_MMU_WARN_ON(order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G) &&
> > -                     order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M) &&
> > -                     order != KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_4K));
> > -
> > -     if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_1G))
> > -             return PG_LEVEL_1G;
> > -
> > -     if (order >= KVM_HPAGE_GFN_SHIFT(PG_LEVEL_2M))
> > -             return PG_LEVEL_2M;
> > -
> > -     return PG_LEVEL_4K;
> > -}
> > -
> >  static u8 kvm_max_level_for_fault_and_order(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                                           struct kvm_page_fault *fault,
> >                                           int order)
> > @@ -4523,7 +4551,7 @@ static int __kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> >  {
> >       unsigned int foll = fault->write ? FOLL_WRITE : 0;
> >
> > -     if (fault->is_private || kvm_gmem_memslot_supports_shared(fault->slot))
> > +     if (fault_from_gmem(fault))
> >               return kvm_mmu_faultin_pfn_gmem(vcpu, fault);
> >
> >       foll |= FOLL_NOWAIT;
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index de7b46ee1762..f9bb025327c3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -2560,6 +2560,7 @@ static inline bool kvm_mem_is_private(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t gfn)
> >  int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >                    gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t *pfn, struct page **page,
> >                    int *max_order);
> > +int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn);
> >  #else
> >  static inline int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm,
> >                                  struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn,
> > @@ -2569,6 +2570,12 @@ static inline int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm,
> >       KVM_BUG_ON(1, kvm);
> >       return -EIO;
> >  }
> > +static inline int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> > +                                      gfn_t gfn)
> > +{
> > +     BUG();
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_KVM_GMEM */
> >
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_KVM_ARCH_GMEM_PREPARE
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > index fe0245335c96..b8e247063b20 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> > @@ -774,6 +774,18 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_get_pfn);
> >
> > +/**
> > + * Returns the mapping order for this @gfn in @slot.
> > + *
> > + * This is equal to max_order that would be returned if kvm_gmem_get_pfn() were
> > + * called now.
> > + */
> make W=1 ./ -s generates following warnings-
>
> warning: This comment starts with '/**', but isn't a kernel-doc comment. Refer Documentation/doc-guide/kernel-doc.rst
>  * Returns the mapping order for this @gfn in @slot
>
> This will fix it.

Thank you!
/fuad

> Subject: [PATCH] tmp
>
> Signed-off-by: Shivank Garg <shivankg@amd.com>
> ---
>  virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c | 8 +++++---
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> index b8e247063b20..d880b9098cc0 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/guest_memfd.c
> @@ -775,10 +775,12 @@ int kvm_gmem_get_pfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_get_pfn);
>
>  /**
> - * Returns the mapping order for this @gfn in @slot.
> + * kvm_gmem_mapping_order - Get the mapping order for a GFN.
> + * @slot: The KVM memory slot containing the @gfn.
> + * @gfn: The guest frame number to check.
>   *
> - * This is equal to max_order that would be returned if kvm_gmem_get_pfn() were
> - * called now.
> + * Returns: The mapping order for a @gfn in @slot. This is equal to max_order
> + *          that kvm_gmem_get_pfn() would return for this @gfn.
>   */
>  int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
>  {
> --
> 2.34.1
>
> Thanks,
> Shivank
>
>
> > +int kvm_gmem_mapping_order(const struct kvm_memory_slot *slot, gfn_t gfn)
> > +{
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_gmem_mapping_order);
> > +
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE
> >  long kvm_gmem_populate(struct kvm *kvm, gfn_t start_gfn, void __user *src, long npages,
> >                      kvm_gmem_populate_cb post_populate, void *opaque)
>

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-14  7:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 88+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-13 16:34 [PATCH v9 00/17] KVM: Mapping guest_memfd backed memory at the host for software protected VMs Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 01/17] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GMEM Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:14   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/17] KVM: Rename CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_PRIVATE_MEM to CONFIG_KVM_GENERIC_GMEM_POPULATE Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 21:56   ` Ira Weiny
2025-05-21  7:14   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 03/17] KVM: Rename kvm_arch_has_private_mem() to kvm_arch_supports_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:15   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 04/17] KVM: x86: Rename kvm->arch.has_private_mem to kvm->arch.supports_gmem Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:15   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 05/17] KVM: Rename kvm_slot_can_be_private() to kvm_slot_has_gmem() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 06/17] KVM: Fix comments that refer to slots_lock Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:16   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 07/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Allow host to map guest_memfd() pages Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 18:37   ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-16 19:21     ` James Houghton
2025-05-18 15:17       ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:36         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-14  8:03   ` Shivank Garg
2025-05-14  9:45     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 10:07   ` Roy, Patrick
2025-05-14 11:30     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 20:40   ` James Houghton
2025-05-15  7:25     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-15 23:42   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16  7:31     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-16  6:08   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16  7:56     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-16 11:12       ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-16 14:20         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:41   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 08/17] KVM: guest_memfd: Check that userspace_addr and fd+offset refer to same range Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 20:30   ` James Houghton
2025-05-14  7:33     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 13:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-14 13:47         ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-14 13:52           ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-14 17:39   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 09/17] KVM: x86/mmu: Handle guest page faults for guest_memfd with shared memory Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  7:48   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  0:40     ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-22  7:16       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  7:46         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-22  8:14           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22 10:24             ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 10/17] KVM: x86: Compute max_mapping_level with input from guest_memfd Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14  7:13   ` Shivank Garg
2025-05-14  7:24     ` Fuad Tabba [this message]
2025-05-14 15:27   ` kernel test robot
2025-05-21  8:01   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  0:45     ` Ackerley Tng
2025-05-22 13:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2025-05-22 13:49         ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  7:22     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-22  8:56       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-22  9:34         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 11/17] KVM: arm64: Refactor user_mem_abort() calculation of force_pte Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 12/17] KVM: arm64: Rename variables in user_mem_abort() Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  2:25   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  9:57     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:02   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 13/17] KVM: arm64: Handle guest_memfd()-backed guest page faults Fuad Tabba
2025-05-14 21:26   ` James Houghton
2025-05-15  9:27     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:04   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 11:10     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 14/17] KVM: arm64: Enable mapping guest_memfd in arm64 Fuad Tabba
2025-05-15 23:50   ` James Houghton
2025-05-16  7:07     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:05   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 10:12     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 10:26       ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 10:29         ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 12:44           ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 13:15             ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 13:21               ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 13:32                 ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21 13:45                   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-21 14:14                     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 15/17] KVM: Introduce the KVM capability KVM_CAP_GMEM_SHARED_MEM Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  2:46   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  8:24     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  8:06   ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 16/17] KVM: selftests: guest_memfd mmap() test when mapping is allowed Fuad Tabba
2025-05-21  6:53   ` Gavin Shan
2025-05-21  9:38     ` Fuad Tabba
2025-05-13 16:34 ` [PATCH v9 17/17] KVM: selftests: Test guest_memfd same-range validation Fuad Tabba

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+EHjTwc9d6QJykgp5CuBga7JMzzTpaJOhB+5RoqvrRg2kgbbA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=amoorthy@google.com \
    --cc=anup@brainfault.org \
    --cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chenhuacai@kernel.org \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=fvdl@google.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=ira.weiny@intel.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@gmail.com \
    --cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
    --cc=jthoughton@google.com \
    --cc=keirf@google.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=liam.merwick@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mail@maciej.szmigiero.name \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=mic@digikod.net \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=pankaj.gupta@amd.com \
    --cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=quic_cvanscha@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_eberman@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_mnalajal@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_pderrin@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_pheragu@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_svaddagi@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_tsoni@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=roypat@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=shivankg@amd.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).