From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kas@kernel.org>,
"Xin Li (Intel)" <xin@zytor.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <darwi@linutronix.de>,
"open list:KVM PARAVIRT (KVM/paravirt)" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)"
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] kvm: x86: implement PV send_IPI method
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2025 19:15:37 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEvNaKgF7bOPUahaYMi6n2vijAXwFvAhQ22LecZGSC-_bg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aHopXN73dHW/uKaT@intel.com>
On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 7:01 PM Chao Gao <chao.gao@intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 03:52:30PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 18, 2025 at 2:25 PM Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >>
> >> We used to have PV version of send_IPI_mask and
> >> send_IPI_mask_allbutself. This patch implements PV send_IPI method to
> >> reduce the number of vmexits.
>
> It won't reduce the number of VM-exits; in fact, it may increase them on CPUs
> that support IPI virtualization.
Sure, but I wonder if it reduces the vmexits when there's no APICV or
L2 VM. I thought it can reduce the 2 vmexits to 1?
>
> With IPI virtualization enabled, *unicast* and physical-addressing IPIs won't
> cause a VM-exit.
Right.
> Instead, the microcode posts interrupts directly to the target
> vCPU. The PV version always causes a VM-exit.
Yes, but it applies to all PV IPI I think.
>
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
> >> Tested-by: Cindy Lu <lulu@redhat.com>
> >
> >I think a question here is are we able to see performance improvement
> >in any kind of setup?
>
> It may result in a negative performance impact.
Userspace can check and enable PV IPI for the case where it suits.
For example, HyperV did something like:
void __init hv_apic_init(void)
{
if (ms_hyperv.hints & HV_X64_CLUSTER_IPI_RECOMMENDED) {
pr_info("Hyper-V: Using IPI hypercalls\n");
/*
* Set the IPI entry points.
*/
orig_apic = *apic;
apic_update_callback(send_IPI, hv_send_ipi);
apic_update_callback(send_IPI_mask, hv_send_ipi_mask);
apic_update_callback(send_IPI_mask_allbutself,
hv_send_ipi_mask_allbutself);
apic_update_callback(send_IPI_allbutself,
hv_send_ipi_allbutself);
apic_update_callback(send_IPI_all, hv_send_ipi_all);
apic_update_callback(send_IPI_self, hv_send_ipi_self);
}
send_IPI_mask is there.
Thanks
>
> >
> >Thanks
> >
> >
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-18 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-18 6:24 [PATCH v1] kvm: x86: implement PV send_IPI method Cindy Lu
2025-07-18 7:52 ` Jason Wang
2025-07-18 11:00 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 11:15 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2025-07-18 12:19 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 14:01 ` Sean Christopherson
2025-07-18 15:15 ` Chao Gao
2025-07-18 15:22 ` Sean Christopherson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CACGkMEvNaKgF7bOPUahaYMi6n2vijAXwFvAhQ22LecZGSC-_bg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=chao.gao@intel.com \
--cc=darwi@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lulu@redhat.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).