From: Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2025 18:56:38 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAGtprH-on3JdsHx-DyjN_z_5Z6HJoSQjJpA5o5_V6=rygMSbtQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250611104844.245235-20-steven.price@arm.com>
On Wed, Jun 11, 2025 at 3:59 AM Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
>
> +static int realm_create_protected_data_page(struct realm *realm,
> + unsigned long ipa,
> + kvm_pfn_t dst_pfn,
> + kvm_pfn_t src_pfn,
> + unsigned long flags)
> +{
> + unsigned long rd = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> + phys_addr_t dst_phys, src_phys;
> + bool undelegate_failed = false;
> + int ret, offset;
> +
> + dst_phys = __pfn_to_phys(dst_pfn);
> + src_phys = __pfn_to_phys(src_pfn);
> +
> + for (offset = 0; offset < PAGE_SIZE; offset += RMM_PAGE_SIZE) {
> + ret = realm_create_protected_data_granule(realm,
> + ipa,
> + dst_phys,
> + src_phys,
> + flags);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err;
> +
> + ipa += RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + dst_phys += RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + src_phys += RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err:
> + if (ret == -EIO) {
> + /* current offset needs undelegating */
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(dst_phys)))
> + undelegate_failed = true;
> + }
> + while (offset > 0) {
> + ipa -= RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + offset -= RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> + dst_phys -= RMM_PAGE_SIZE;
> +
> + rmi_data_destroy(rd, ipa, NULL, NULL);
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(rmi_granule_undelegate(dst_phys)))
> + undelegate_failed = true;
> + }
> +
> + if (undelegate_failed) {
> + /*
> + * A granule could not be undelegated,
> + * so the page has to be leaked
> + */
> + get_page(pfn_to_page(dst_pfn));
I would like to point out that the support for in-place conversion
with guest_memfd using hugetlb pages [1] is under discussion.
As part of the in-place conversion, the policy we are routing for is
to avoid any "refcounts" from KVM on folios supplied by guest_memfd as
in-place conversion works by splitting and merging folios during
memory conversion as per discussion at LPC [2].
The best way to avoid further use of this page with huge page support
around would be either:
1) Explicitly Inform guest_memfd of a particular pfn being in use by
KVM without relying on page refcounts or
2) Set the page as hwpoisoned. (Needs further discussion)
This page refcounting strategy will have to be revisited depending on
which series lands first. That being said, it would be great if ARM
could review/verify if the series [1] works for backing CCA VMs with
huge pages.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/cover.1747264138.git.ackerleytng@google.com/
[2] https://lpc.events/event/18/contributions/1764/
> + }
> +
> + return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +static int populate_region(struct kvm *kvm,
> + phys_addr_t ipa_base,
> + phys_addr_t ipa_end,
> + unsigned long data_flags)
> +{
> + struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *memslot;
> + gfn_t base_gfn, end_gfn;
> + int idx;
> + phys_addr_t ipa = ipa_base;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + base_gfn = gpa_to_gfn(ipa_base);
> + end_gfn = gpa_to_gfn(ipa_end);
> +
> + idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->srcu);
> + memslot = gfn_to_memslot(kvm, base_gfn);
> + if (!memslot) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + /* We require the region to be contained within a single memslot */
> + if (memslot->base_gfn + memslot->npages < end_gfn) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!kvm_slot_can_be_private(memslot)) {
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + while (ipa < ipa_end) {
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + unsigned long hva;
> + struct page *page;
> + bool writeable;
> + kvm_pfn_t pfn;
> + kvm_pfn_t priv_pfn;
> + struct page *gmem_page;
> +
> + hva = gfn_to_hva_memslot(memslot, gpa_to_gfn(ipa));
> + vma = vma_lookup(current->mm, hva);
> + if (!vma) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + pfn = __kvm_faultin_pfn(memslot, gpa_to_gfn(ipa), FOLL_WRITE,
> + &writeable, &page);
Is this assuming double backing of guest memory ranges? Is this logic
trying to simulate a shared fault?
Does memory population work with CCA if priv_pfn and pfn are the same?
I am curious how the memory population will work with in-place
conversion support available for guest_memfd files.
> +
> + if (is_error_pfn(pfn)) {
> + ret = -EFAULT;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + ret = kvm_gmem_get_pfn(kvm, memslot,
> + ipa >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> + &priv_pfn, &gmem_page, NULL);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = realm_create_protected_data_page(realm, ipa,
> + priv_pfn,
> + pfn,
> + data_flags);
> +
> + kvm_release_page_clean(page);
> +
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + ipa += PAGE_SIZE;
> + }
> +
> +out:
> + srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->srcu, idx);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-08-01 1:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 89+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-11 10:47 [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 01/43] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:47 ` [PATCH v9 02/43] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 03/43] arm64: RME: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 04/43] arm64: RME: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 05/43] arm64: RME: Check for RME support at KVM init Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 06/43] arm64: RME: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:29 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 07/43] arm64: RME: ioctls to create and configure realms Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:47 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 13:17 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 08/43] kvm: arm64: Don't expose debug capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 09/43] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:38 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 10/43] arm64: RME: RTT tear down Steven Price
2025-06-16 10:41 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 11/43] arm64: RME: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2025-06-25 9:00 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 12/43] KVM: arm64: vgic: Provide helper for number of list registers Steven Price
2025-07-01 10:16 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 13/43] arm64: RME: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-01 10:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-03 13:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 14/43] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2025-07-01 6:42 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:49 ` Joey Gouly
2025-07-09 15:29 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 15/43] arm64: RME: Allow VMM to set RIPAS Steven Price
2025-06-17 12:56 ` zhuangyiwei
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-06-18 12:33 ` Andre Przywara
2025-06-23 14:45 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:37 ` Gavin Shan
2025-07-09 14:42 ` Steven Price
2025-07-10 5:24 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 16/43] arm64: RME: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:45 ` Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-07-02 0:41 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 17/43] arm64: RME: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2025-07-02 0:44 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 18/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 19/43] arm64: RME: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2025-08-01 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve [this message]
2025-08-13 9:30 ` Steven Price
2025-08-14 16:26 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-15 15:48 ` Steven Price
2025-08-15 18:18 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-08-16 1:56 ` Vishal Annapurve
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 20/43] arm64: RME: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2025-06-16 11:55 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-23 16:04 ` Steven Price
2025-07-02 1:04 ` Gavin Shan
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 21/43] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 22/43] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2025-06-24 15:10 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 23/43] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 24/43] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 25/43] arm64: Don't expose stolen time for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 26/43] arm64: RME: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 27/43] arm64: RME: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 28/43] arm64: RME: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2025-06-24 12:50 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 29/43] arm64: RME: Always use 4k pages for realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 30/43] arm64: RME: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 31/43] arm_pmu: Provide a mechanism for disabling the physical IRQ Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 32/43] arm64: RME: Enable PMU support with a realm guest Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 33/43] arm64: RME: Hide KVM_CAP_READONLY_MEM for realm guests Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 34/43] arm64: RME: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:20 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 35/43] arm64: RME: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 36/43] arm64: RME: Initialize PMCR.N with number counter supported by RMM Steven Price
2025-07-24 10:47 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 37/43] arm64: RME: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 38/43] arm64: RME: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 39/43] arm64: RME: Provide register list for unfinalized RME RECs Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 40/43] arm64: RME: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 41/43] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2025-06-12 15:14 ` Joey Gouly
2025-06-12 15:32 ` Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 42/43] KVM: arm64: Expose KVM_ARM_VCPU_REC to user space Steven Price
2025-06-11 10:48 ` [PATCH v9 43/43] KVM: arm64: Allow activating realms Steven Price
2025-06-25 1:51 ` [PATCH v9 00/43] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Emi Kisanuki (Fujitsu)
2025-06-27 10:37 ` Steven Price
2025-07-04 4:58 ` Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CAGtprH-on3JdsHx-DyjN_z_5Z6HJoSQjJpA5o5_V6=rygMSbtQ@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=alpergun@google.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
--cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
--cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).