kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 4/4] kvm: vmx: Raise #UD on unsupported XSAVES/XRSTORS
Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2017 13:41:27 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALMp9eTCBV2sB-QaUuryJyr3ruSWsqiWS_7CTYWnOmYPRGZPgg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1503590999-45126-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Reviewed-by: Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>

On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote:
> A guest may not be configured to support XSAVES/XRSTORS, even when the host
> does. If the guest does not support XSAVES/XRSTORS, clear the secondary
> execution control so that the processor will raise #UD.
>
> Also clear the "allowed-1" bit for XSAVES/XRSTORS exiting in the
> IA32_VMX_PROCBASED_CTLS2 MSR, and pass through VMCS12's control in
> the VMCS02.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> index 954e26079cd6..08bfeb8c32ea 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1358,8 +1358,7 @@ static inline int nested_cpu_has_ept(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>
>  static inline bool nested_cpu_has_xsaves(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>  {
> -       return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES) &&
> -               vmx_xsaves_supported();
> +       return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12, SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES);
>  }
>
>  static inline bool nested_cpu_has_pml(struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
> @@ -2823,8 +2822,7 @@ static void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE |
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
> -               SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING |
> -               SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
> +               SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING;
>
>         if (enable_ept) {
>                 /* nested EPT: emulate EPT also to L1 */
> @@ -5319,6 +5317,25 @@ static void vmx_compute_secondary_exec_control(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx)
>         if (!enable_pml)
>                 exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML;
>
> +       if (vmx_xsaves_supported()) {
> +               /* Exposing XSAVES only when XSAVE is exposed */
> +               bool xsaves_enabled =
> +                       guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVE) &&
> +                       guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_XSAVES);
> +
> +               if (!xsaves_enabled)
> +                       exec_control &= ~SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
> +
> +               if (nested) {
> +                       if (xsaves_enabled)
> +                               vmx->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high |=
> +                                       SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
> +                       else
> +                               vmx->nested.nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
> +                                       ~SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
> +               }
> +       }
> +
>         if (vmx_rdtscp_supported()) {
>                 bool rdtscp_enabled = guest_cpuid_has(vcpu, X86_FEATURE_RDTSCP);
>                 if (!rdtscp_enabled)
> @@ -10421,6 +10438,7 @@ static int prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12,
>                 exec_control &= ~(SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
>                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_INVPCID |
>                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_RDTSCP |
> +                                 SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES |
>                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUAL_INTR_DELIVERY |
>                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_APIC_REGISTER_VIRT |
>                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_VMFUNC);
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>

      reply	other threads:[~2017-08-24 20:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-24 13:37 [PATCH v7 0/4] Raise #UD and disable execution controls for more CPUID bits Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 1/4] KVM: VMX: cache secondary exec controls Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 14:47   ` Jim Mattson
2017-08-24 15:25     ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 15:41       ` Jim Mattson
2017-08-24 15:46         ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 16:02           ` Jim Mattson
2017-08-24 16:08             ` Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 2/4] kvm: vmx: Raise #UD on unsupported RDRAND Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 17:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 3/4] kvm: vmx: Raise #UD on unsupported RDSEED Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 17:42   ` David Hildenbrand
2017-08-24 13:37 ` [PATCH 4/4] kvm: vmx: Raise #UD on unsupported XSAVES/XRSTORS Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 14:54   ` Jim Mattson
2017-08-24 16:09     ` [PATCH v8 " Paolo Bonzini
2017-08-24 20:41       ` Jim Mattson [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CALMp9eTCBV2sB-QaUuryJyr3ruSWsqiWS_7CTYWnOmYPRGZPgg@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).