From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: "Clark, Robert Graham" <robert.clark@hp.com>
Subject: SYSRET 64-Bit Breakout
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:26:48 +0000
Message-ID: <CBFE4597.68DC%robert.clark@hp.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
To: "kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from g4t0015.houston.hp.com ([15.201.24.18]:39547 "EHLO
	g4t0015.houston.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754012Ab2FMM2O convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT
	<rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:28:14 -0400
Received: from G5W2206G.americas.hpqcorp.net (g5w2206g.atlanta.hp.com [16.228.43.185])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by g4t0015.houston.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD43085ED
	for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 13 Jun 2012 12:28:13 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Language: en-US
Content-ID: <EAD03284748EB64B993840A8A7F6297D@Compaq.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

All,

I've been looking at http://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/649219

Xen appears to be vulnerable as do a number of other products. KVM isn't listed. Some discussion on IRC indicates that KVM isn't likely to be vulnerable.

Can anyone confirm please?

-Rob