public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nicholas Piggin" <npiggin@gmail.com>
To: "Nina Schoetterl-Glausch" <nsg@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Nico Böhr" <nrb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Thomas Huth" <thuth@redhat.com>,
	"Andrew Jones" <andrew.jones@linux.dev>,
	"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] s390x: Add function for checking diagnose intercepts
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 12:14:45 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <D28QHQGLKAKJ.NZ0V3NUSSFP8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240620141700.4124157-5-nsg@linux.ibm.com>

On Fri Jun 21, 2024 at 12:16 AM AEST, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote:
> sie_is_diag_icpt() checks if the intercept is due to an expected
> diagnose call and is valid.
> It subsumes pv_icptdata_check_diag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch <nsg@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  lib/s390x/pv_icptdata.h | 42 --------------------------------
>  lib/s390x/sie.h         | 12 ++++++++++
>  lib/s390x/sie.c         | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  s390x/pv-diags.c        |  8 +++----
>  s390x/pv-icptcode.c     | 11 ++++-----
>  s390x/pv-ipl.c          |  7 +++---
>  6 files changed, 76 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 lib/s390x/pv_icptdata.h
>
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/pv_icptdata.h b/lib/s390x/pv_icptdata.h
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 4746117e..00000000
> --- a/lib/s390x/pv_icptdata.h
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@
> -/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */
> -/*
> - * Commonly used checks for PV SIE intercept data
> - *
> - * Copyright IBM Corp. 2023
> - * Author: Janosch Frank <frankja@linux.ibm.com>
> - */
> -
> -#ifndef _S390X_PV_ICPTDATA_H_
> -#define _S390X_PV_ICPTDATA_H_
> -
> -#include <sie.h>
> -
> -/*
> - * Checks the diagnose instruction intercept data for consistency with
> - * the constants defined by the PV SIE architecture
> - *
> - * Supports: 0x44, 0x9c, 0x288, 0x308, 0x500
> - */
> -static bool pv_icptdata_check_diag(struct vm *vm, int diag)
> -{
> -	int icptcode;
> -
> -	switch (diag) {
> -	case 0x44:
> -	case 0x9c:
> -	case 0x288:
> -	case 0x308:
> -		icptcode = ICPT_PV_NOTIFY;
> -		break;
> -	case 0x500:
> -		icptcode = ICPT_PV_INSTR;
> -		break;
> -	default:
> -		/* If a new diag is introduced add it to the cases above! */
> -		assert(0);
> -	}
> -
> -	return vm->sblk->icptcode == icptcode && vm->sblk->ipa == 0x8302 &&
> -	       vm->sblk->ipb == 0x50000000 && vm->save_area.guest.grs[5] == diag;
> -}
> -#endif
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.h b/lib/s390x/sie.h
> index 53cd767f..6d1a0d6e 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sie.h
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sie.h
> @@ -287,6 +287,18 @@ static inline bool sie_is_pv(struct vm *vm)
>  	return vm->sblk->sdf == 2;
>  }
>  
> +/**
> + * sie_is_diag_icpt() - Check if intercept is due to diagnose instruction
> + * @vm: the guest
> + * @diag: the expected diagnose code
> + *
> + * Check that the intercept is due to diagnose @diag and valid.
> + * For protected virtualisation, check that the intercept data meets additional
> + * constraints.
> + *
> + * Returns: true if intercept is due to a valid and has matching diagnose code
> + */
> +bool sie_is_diag_icpt(struct vm *vm, unsigned int diag);
>  void sie_guest_sca_create(struct vm *vm);
>  void sie_guest_create(struct vm *vm, uint64_t guest_mem, uint64_t guest_mem_len);
>  void sie_guest_destroy(struct vm *vm);
> diff --git a/lib/s390x/sie.c b/lib/s390x/sie.c
> index 0fa915cf..d4ba2a40 100644
> --- a/lib/s390x/sie.c
> +++ b/lib/s390x/sie.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,59 @@ void sie_check_validity(struct vm *vm, uint16_t vir_exp)
>  	report(vir_exp == vir, "VALIDITY: %x", vir);
>  }
>  
> +bool sie_is_diag_icpt(struct vm *vm, unsigned int diag)
> +{
> +	union {
> +		struct {
> +			uint64_t     : 16;
> +			uint64_t ipa : 16;
> +			uint64_t ipb : 32;
> +		};
> +		struct {
> +			uint64_t          : 16;
> +			uint64_t opcode   :  8;
> +			uint64_t r_1      :  4;
> +			uint64_t r_2      :  4;
> +			uint64_t r_base   :  4;
> +			uint64_t displace : 12;
> +			uint64_t zero     : 16;
> +		};
> +	} instr = { .ipa = vm->sblk->ipa, .ipb = vm->sblk->ipb };
> +	uint8_t icptcode;
> +	uint64_t code;
> +
> +	switch (diag) {
> +	case 0x44:
> +	case 0x9c:
> +	case 0x288:
> +	case 0x308:
> +		icptcode = ICPT_PV_NOTIFY;
> +		break;
> +	case 0x500:
> +		icptcode = ICPT_PV_INSTR;
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		/* If a new diag is introduced add it to the cases above! */
> +		assert_msg(false, "unknown diag");
> +	}
> +
> +	if (sie_is_pv(vm)) {
> +		if (instr.r_1 != 0 || instr.r_2 != 2 || instr.r_base != 5)
> +			return false;
> +		if (instr.displace)
> +			return false;
> +	} else {
> +		icptcode = ICPT_INST;
> +	}
> +	if (vm->sblk->icptcode != icptcode)
> +		return false;
> +	if (instr.opcode != 0x83 || instr.zero)
> +		return false;
> +	code = instr.r_base ? vm->save_area.guest.grs[instr.r_base] : 0;
> +	code = (code + instr.displace) & 0xffff;
> +	return code == diag;
> +}

It looks like this transformation is equivalent for the PV case. You
could put the switch into the sie_is_pv() branch? Otherwise looks okay.

Reviewed-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>

> +
>  void sie_handle_validity(struct vm *vm)
>  {
>  	if (vm->sblk->icptcode != ICPT_VALIDITY)
> diff --git a/s390x/pv-diags.c b/s390x/pv-diags.c
> index 3193ad99..6ebe469a 100644
> --- a/s390x/pv-diags.c
> +++ b/s390x/pv-diags.c
> @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
>   */
>  #include <libcflat.h>
>  #include <snippet.h>
> -#include <pv_icptdata.h>
>  #include <sie.h>
>  #include <sclp.h>
>  #include <asm/facility.h>
> @@ -32,8 +31,7 @@ static void test_diag_500(void)
>  			size_gbin, size_hdr, SNIPPET_UNPACK_OFF);
>  
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x500),
> -	       "intercept values");
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x500), "intercept values");
>  	report(vm.save_area.guest.grs[1] == 1 &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[2] == 2 &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[3] == 3 &&
> @@ -45,7 +43,7 @@ static void test_diag_500(void)
>  	 */
>  	vm.sblk->iictl = IICTL_CODE_OPERAND;
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x9c) &&
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x9c) &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[0] == PGM_INT_CODE_OPERAND,
>  	       "operand exception");
>  
> @@ -57,7 +55,7 @@ static void test_diag_500(void)
>  	vm.sblk->iictl = IICTL_CODE_SPECIFICATION;
>  	/* Inject PGM, next exit should be 9c */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x9c) &&
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x9c) &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[0] == PGM_INT_CODE_SPECIFICATION,
>  	       "specification exception");
>  
> diff --git a/s390x/pv-icptcode.c b/s390x/pv-icptcode.c
> index d7c47d6f..bc90df1e 100644
> --- a/s390x/pv-icptcode.c
> +++ b/s390x/pv-icptcode.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>  #include <smp.h>
>  #include <sclp.h>
>  #include <snippet.h>
> -#include <pv_icptdata.h>
>  #include <asm/facility.h>
>  #include <asm/barrier.h>
>  #include <asm/sigp.h>
> @@ -47,7 +46,7 @@ static void test_validity_timing(void)
>  			size_gbin, size_hdr, SNIPPET_UNPACK_OFF);
>  
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x44), "spt done");
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x44), "spt done");
>  	stck(&time_exit);
>  	tmp = vm.sblk->cputm;
>  	mb();
> @@ -258,7 +257,7 @@ static void test_validity_asce(void)
>  
>  	/* Try if we can still do an entry with the correct asce */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x44), "re-entry with valid CR1");
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x44), "re-entry with valid CR1");
>  	uv_destroy_guest(&vm);
>  	free_pages(pgd_new);
>  	report_prefix_pop();
> @@ -294,7 +293,7 @@ static void run_icpt_122_tests_prefix(unsigned long prefix)
>  
>  	sie(&vm);
>  	/* Guest indicates that it has been setup via the diag 0x44 */
> -	assert(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x44));
> +	assert(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x44));
>  	/* If the pages have not been shared these writes will cause exceptions */
>  	ptr = (uint32_t *)prefix;
>  	WRITE_ONCE(ptr, 0);
> @@ -328,7 +327,7 @@ static void test_icpt_112(void)
>  
>  	/* Setup of the guest's state for 0x0 prefix */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	assert(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x44));
> +	assert(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x44));
>  
>  	/* Test on standard 0x0 prefix */
>  	run_icpt_122_tests_prefix(0);
> @@ -348,7 +347,7 @@ static void test_icpt_112(void)
>  
>  	/* Try a re-entry after everything has been imported again */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x9c) &&
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x9c) &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[0] == 42,
>  	       "re-entry successful");
>  	report_prefix_pop();
> diff --git a/s390x/pv-ipl.c b/s390x/pv-ipl.c
> index cc46e7f7..cd49bd95 100644
> --- a/s390x/pv-ipl.c
> +++ b/s390x/pv-ipl.c
> @@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
>  #include <sie.h>
>  #include <sclp.h>
>  #include <snippet.h>
> -#include <pv_icptdata.h>
>  #include <asm/facility.h>
>  #include <asm/uv.h>
>  
> @@ -35,7 +34,7 @@ static void test_diag_308(int subcode)
>  
>  	/* First exit is a diag 0x500 */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	assert(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x500));
> +	assert(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x500));
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * The snippet asked us for the subcode and we answer by
> @@ -46,7 +45,7 @@ static void test_diag_308(int subcode)
>  
>  	/* Continue after diag 0x500, next icpt should be the 0x308 */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	assert(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x308));
> +	assert(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x308));
>  	assert(vm.save_area.guest.grs[2] == subcode);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -118,7 +117,7 @@ static void test_diag_308(int subcode)
>  	 * see a diagnose 0x9c PV instruction notification.
>  	 */
>  	sie(&vm);
> -	report(pv_icptdata_check_diag(&vm, 0x9c) &&
> +	report(sie_is_diag_icpt(&vm, 0x9c) &&
>  	       vm.save_area.guest.grs[0] == 42,
>  	       "continue after load");
>  


  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-06-25  2:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-20 14:16 [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 0/7] s390x: STFLE nested interpretation Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 1/7] lib: Add pseudo random functions Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-25  3:08   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-25  7:06     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-08-12 14:17   ` Andrew Jones
2024-10-10  8:25   ` Nico Boehr
2024-10-10  8:37     ` Andrew Jones
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 2/7] s390x: lib: Remove double include Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-21  6:58   ` Janosch Frank
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 3/7] s390x: Add sie_is_pv Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 16:41   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-21  6:59   ` Janosch Frank
2024-06-25  1:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 4/7] s390x: Add function for checking diagnose intercepts Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 16:47   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-20 17:46     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-21  7:13   ` Janosch Frank
2024-06-25  2:14   ` Nicholas Piggin [this message]
2024-06-25  8:11     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-25 23:52       ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 5/7] s390x: Add library functions for exiting from snippet Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 16:55   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-20 17:16     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 17:26       ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-25  3:13         ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-25  2:43   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-10-16 14:42     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-25  2:57   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-25  9:21     ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-20 14:16 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 6/7] s390x: Use library functions for snippet exit Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 16:56   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-25  2:58   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-06-20 14:17 ` [kvm-unit-tests PATCH v3 7/7] s390x: Add test for STFLE interpretive execution (format-0) Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-20 17:25   ` Claudio Imbrenda
2024-06-20 17:42     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-06-25  3:11   ` Nicholas Piggin
2024-08-27 14:08   ` Nico Boehr
2024-09-02 14:24     ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch
2024-09-03 10:46       ` Heiko Carstens
2024-10-10  8:27       ` Nico Boehr
2024-10-15 11:01         ` Nina Schoetterl-Glausch

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=D28QHQGLKAKJ.NZ0V3NUSSFP8@gmail.com \
    --to=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrew.jones@linux.dev \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nrb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=nsg@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox