From: "Christoph Schlameuss" <schlameuss@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Janosch Frank" <frankja@linux.ibm.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
"Christian Borntraeger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
"Claudio Imbrenda" <imbrenda@linux.ibm.com>,
"David Hildenbrand" <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs
Date: Wed, 09 Oct 2024 10:13:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <D4R4I5P8CF25.3BEXWSI95E0XO@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f084bbf5-2109-4424-b1c1-217b4246a1b6@linux.ibm.com>
On Tue Oct 8, 2024 at 3:03 PM CEST, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 10/8/24 2:56 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> > On 10/8/24 9:42 AM, Christoph Schlameuss wrote:
> >> Add a test case verifying KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION and
> >> KVM_SET_USER_MEMORY_REGION2 cannot be executed on ucontrol VMs.
> >>
> >> Executing this test case on not patched kernels will cause a null
> >> pointer dereference in the host kernel.
> >> This is fixed with commit:
> >> commit 7816e58967d0 ("kvm: s390: Reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs")
> >
> > I'm going to remove the "commit" prefix from the line above when picking.
> >
>
> Argh, just found out that this is a checkpatch enforced style...
> Alright then.
Yes, sadly I did not find a way here so that checkstyle is completely happy with
this :/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-09 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 7:42 [PATCH v5 0/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Add ucontrol memory selftests Christoph Schlameuss
2024-10-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_map_unmap VM test case Christoph Schlameuss
2024-10-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Add uc_skey " Christoph Schlameuss
2024-10-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Verify reject memory region operations for ucontrol VMs Christoph Schlameuss
2024-10-08 12:56 ` Janosch Frank
2024-10-08 13:03 ` Janosch Frank
2024-10-09 8:13 ` Christoph Schlameuss [this message]
2024-10-08 7:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] selftests: kvm: s390: Fix whitespace confusion in ucontrol test Christoph Schlameuss
2024-10-08 12:15 ` Janosch Frank
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=D4R4I5P8CF25.3BEXWSI95E0XO@linux.ibm.com \
--to=schlameuss@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox