From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@ventanamicro.com>
To: "Jinyu Tang" <tjytimi@163.com>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Atish Patra" <atish.patra@linux.dev>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
"Yong-Xuan Wang" <yongxuan.wang@sifive.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Nutty Liu" <nutty.liu@hotmail.com>,
"Tianshun Sun" <stsmail163@163.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-riscv" <linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: riscv: Power on secondary vCPUs from migration
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2025 16:19:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DCTFU1UCDSZZ.3J6L3T6TYTELM@ventanamicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250915122334.1351865-1-tjytimi@163.com>
2025-09-15T20:23:34+08:00, Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>:
> The current logic keeps all secondary VCPUs powered off on their
> first run in kvm_arch_vcpu_postcreate(), relying on the boot VCPU
> to wake them up by sbi call. This is correct for a fresh VM start,
> where VCPUs begin execution at the bootaddress (0x80000000).
>
> However, this behavior is not suitable for VCPUs that are being
> restored from a state (e.g., during migration resume or snapshot
> load). These VCPUs have a saved program counter (sepc). Forcing
> them to wait for a wake-up from the boot VCPU, which may not
> happen or may happen incorrectly, leaves them in a stuck state
> when using Qemu to migration if smp is larger than one.
>
> So check a cold start and a warm resumption by the value of the
> guest's sepc register. If the VCPU is running for the first time
> *and* its sepc is not the hardware boot address, it indicates a
> resumed vCPU that must be powered on immediately to continue
> execution from its saved context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jinyu Tang <tjytimi@163.com>
> Tested-by: Tianshun Sun <stsmail163@163.com>
> ---
I don't like this approach. Userspace controls the state of the VM, and
KVM shouldn't randomly change the state that userspace wants.
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu.c
> @@ -867,8 +867,16 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> struct kvm_cpu_trap trap;
> struct kvm_run *run = vcpu->run;
>
> - if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once)
> + if (!vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once) {
> kvm_riscv_vcpu_setup_config(vcpu);
> + /*
> + * For VCPUs that are resuming (e.g., from migration)
> + * and not starting from the boot address, explicitly
> + * power them on.
> + */
> + if (vcpu->arch.guest_context.sepc != 0x80000000)
Offlined VCPUs are not guaranteed to have sepc == 0x80000000, so this
patch would incorrectly wake them up.
(Depending on vcpu->arch.ran_atleast_once is flaky at best as well.)
Please try to fix userspace instead,
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-15 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 12:23 [PATCH] KVM: riscv: Power on secondary vCPUs from migration Jinyu Tang
2025-09-15 14:19 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2025-09-15 18:54 ` Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DCTFU1UCDSZZ.3J6L3T6TYTELM@ventanamicro.com \
--to=rkrcmar@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=atish.patra@linux.dev \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv-bounces@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nutty.liu@hotmail.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=stsmail163@163.com \
--cc=tjytimi@163.com \
--cc=yongxuan.wang@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox