From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: James Morris Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 00/01]qemu VM entrypoints Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 16:30:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: References: <20070720201101.GC12218@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm-devel , David Windsor , Joshua Brindle , selinux To: "Daniel P. Berrange" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070720201101.GC12218-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org Errors-To: kvm-devel-bounces-5NWGOfrQmneRv+LV9MX5uipxlwaOVQ5f@public.gmane.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On Fri, 20 Jul 2007, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: > It could be - if your put the policy at the control API layer instead of > in QEMU itself. Then you can bypass MAC security by invoking qemu directly. - James -- James Morris ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/