public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>, <joro@8bytes.org>,
	<alex.williamson@redhat.com>, <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
	<robin.murphy@arm.com>, <cohuck@redhat.com>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	<chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com>, <yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com>,
	<peterx@redhat.com>, <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>, <lulu@redhat.com>,
	<suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>,
	<baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/17] iommufd/hw_pagetable: Use domain_alloc_user op for domain allocation
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2023 14:22:26 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y+VyIvKYmCdMG5i7@Asurada-Nvidia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y+VaCV7DRR1+mLYY@nvidia.com>

On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 04:39:37PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 11:51:31AM -0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 02:36:49PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2023 at 12:59:58PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> > > > really should highlight that).  Otherwise, conditionally calling
> > > > iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus) when !ops->domain_alloc_user (instead
> > > > of returning -EOPNOTSUPP) seems to restore the prior functionality
> > > > for me.
> > > 
> > > Yes, that is right if the input user data is 0 length or full of 0s
> > > then we should call the normal driver function
> > 
> > Maybe I am wrong, yet I recall that doing ops->domain_alloc_user
> > without a fallback was intentional to rule out drivers that don't
> > support IOMMUFD?
> 
> I think we moved away from that to the idea of using the dma_domain
> patch I suggested..
> 
> > To be backward-compatible and concern about SMMU, we can opt in
> > ops->domain_alloc_user upon availability and then add a fallback:
> > 
> > 	if ((!ops || !ops->domain_alloc_user) && user_data) {
> > 		rc = -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > 		goto out_abort;
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	if (ops->domain_alloc_user)
> > 		hwpt->domain = ops->domain_alloc_user(dev, NULL, NULL);
> > 	else
> > 		hwpt->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > 	if (!hwpt->domain) {
> > 		rc = -ENOMEM;
> > 		goto out_abort;
> > 	}
> > 
> > Yet, even by doing so, this series having the PATCH 07/17 that
> > moves iopt_table_add_domain() would temporally break IOMMUFD on
> > ARM platforms, until we add the ops->domain_alloc_user to SMMU
> > drivers.
> 
> Drop patch 7 and 8
> 
> Change patch 12 so it has a unique flow to allocate and IOAS map a
> HWPT that does not try to share so much code with the existing flow.
> 
> The HWPT flow should always just call allocate and then map with no
> effort to attach first. This will fail on ARM SMMU at this point, and
> that is fine.
> 
> All the existing code should work exactly as it is now and not have
> any need to be changed.
> 
> Where things when wrong was trying to share
> "__iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc", I think.
> 
> Don't try to consolidate at this point. Once all the drivers are
> updated then we could try to consolidate things.

Yea, I think that's the only way out for now. Though I am not
sure about other drivers yet, hopefully the SMMU driver(s) is
the last one that we need to update...

Thanks
Nic

  reply	other threads:[~2023-02-09 22:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-02-09  4:31 [PATCH 00/17] Add Intel VT-d nested translation Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 01/17] iommu: Add new iommu op to create domains owned by userspace Yi Liu
2023-02-10  8:24   ` Tian, Kevin
2023-02-11  3:16     ` Baolu Lu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 02/17] iommu: Add nested domain support Yi Liu
2023-02-14 18:47   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 03/17] iommu/vt-d: Extend dmar_domain to support nested domain Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 04/17] iommu/vt-d: Add helper to setup pasid nested translation Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 05/17] iommu/vt-d: Add nested domain support Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 06/17] iommufd/hw_pagetable: Use domain_alloc_user op for domain allocation Yi Liu
2023-02-09 17:59   ` Matthew Rosato
2023-02-09 18:36     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-09 19:51       ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-09 20:39         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-09 22:22           ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2023-02-09 23:59             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-10 10:50             ` Liu, Yi L
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 07/17] iommufd: Add/del hwpt to IOAS at alloc/destroy() Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 08/17] iommufd: Split iommufd_hw_pagetable_alloc() Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 09/17] iommufd: Add kernel-managed hw_pagetable allocation for userspace Yi Liu
2023-02-09 20:45   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-02-10 10:52     ` Liu, Yi L
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 10/17] iommufd/device: Move IOAS attaching and detaching operations into helpers Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 11/17] iommufd: Add infrastructure for user-managed hw_pagetable allocation Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 12/17] iommufd: Add " Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 13/17] iommufd/device: Report supported stage-1 page table types Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 14/17] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_MOCK_DOMAIN_REPLACE test op Yi Liu
2023-02-14 18:36   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 15/17] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOMMU_HWPT_ALLOC ioctl Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 16/17] iommufd/selftest: Add IOMMU_TEST_OP_MD_CHECK_IOTLB test op Yi Liu
2023-02-09  4:31 ` [PATCH 17/17] iommufd/selftest: Add coverage for IOMMU_HWPT_INVALIDATE ioctl Yi Liu
2023-02-09 10:11 ` [PATCH 00/17] Add Intel VT-d nested translation Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-02-09 16:10   ` Nicolin Chen
2023-02-09 16:16     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2023-02-17 18:20 ` Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y+VyIvKYmCdMG5i7@Asurada-Nvidia \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=chao.p.peng@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lulu@redhat.com \
    --cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=yi.y.sun@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox