public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>
Cc: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/1] KVM: selftests: rseq_test: use vdso_getcpu() instead of syscall()
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2022 20:27:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2V1sFwqMR36Yq/H@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y2RzdQVvZnS7wcMr@google.com>

On Fri, Nov 04, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 03, 2022, Gavin Shan wrote:
> > On 11/3/22 8:46 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2022, Robert Hoo wrote:
> > > > @@ -253,7 +269,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > > >   			 * across the seq_cnt reads.
> > > >   			 */
> > > >   			smp_rmb();
> > > > -			sys_getcpu(&cpu);
> > > > +			vdso_getcpu(&cpu, NULL, NULL);
> > > >   			rseq_cpu = rseq_current_cpu_raw();
> > > >   			smp_rmb();
> > > >   		} while (snapshot != atomic_read(&seq_cnt));
> > > 
> > > Something seems off here.  Half of the iterations in the migration thread have a
> > > delay of 5+us, which should be more than enough time to complete a few getcpu()
> > > syscalls to stabilize the CPU.
> > > 
> > > Has anyone tried to figure out why the vCPU thread is apparently running slow?
> > > E.g. is KVM_RUN itself taking a long time, is the task not getting scheduled in,
> > > etc...  I can see how using vDSO would make the vCPU more efficient, but I'm
> > > curious as to why that's a problem in the first place.
> > > 
> > > Anyways, assuming there's no underlying problem that can be solved, the easier
> > > solution is to just bump the delay in the migration thread.  As per its gigantic
> > > comment, the original bug reproduced with up to 500us delays, so bumping the min
> > > delay to e.g. 5us is acceptable.  If that doesn't guarantee the vCPU meets its
> > > quota, then something else is definitely going on.
> > > 
> > 
> > I doubt if it's still caused by busy system as mentioned previously [1]. At least,
> > I failed to reproduce the issue on my ARM64 system until some workloads are enforced
> > to hog CPUs.
> 
> Yeah, I suspect something else as well.  My best guest at this point is mitigations,
> I'll test that tomorrow to see if it makes any difference.

So much for the mitigations theory, the migration thread gets slowed down more than
the vCPU thread.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-11-04 20:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-02  2:01 [RFC 0/1] KVM: selftests: rseq_test: use vdso_getcpu() instead of syscall() Robert Hoo
2022-11-02  2:01 ` [RFC 1/1] " Robert Hoo
2022-11-02  4:24   ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-02 12:46     ` Robert Hoo
2022-11-03  0:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-03  1:16     ` Gavin Shan
2022-11-04  2:05       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-04 20:27         ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-03  2:59     ` Robert Hoo
2022-11-04  2:07       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y2V1sFwqMR36Yq/H@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox