From: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
Cc: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>,
"Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
"Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
"Albert Ou" <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
"Anup Patel" <anup@brainfault.org>,
"Atish Patra" <atishp@atishpatra.org>,
"Andrew Jones" <ajones@ventanamicro.com>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2022 18:36:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y446PdlUPGw5iB71@spud> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y44Q/B6THtP38eyL@xhacker>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5277 bytes --]
Heiko, Jisheng,
On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 11:40:44PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 04:31:08PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> > Am Sonntag, 4. Dezember 2022, 18:46:20 CET schrieb Jisheng Zhang:
> > > Alternatives live in a different section, so offsets used by jal
> > > instruction will point to wrong locations after the patch got applied.
> > >
> > > Similar to arm64, adjust the location to consider that offset.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h | 2 ++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 3 +++
> > > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> > > index c58ec3cc4bc3..33eae9541684 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h
> > > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ void apply_module_alternatives(void *start, size_t length);
> > >
> > > void riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len,
> > > int patch_offset);
> > > +void riscv_alternative_fix_jal(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len,
> > > + int patch_offset);
> > >
> > > struct alt_entry {
> > > void *old_ptr; /* address of original instruciton or data */
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c
> > > index 292cc42dc3be..9d88375624b5 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c
> > > @@ -125,6 +125,44 @@ void riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len,
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > +#define to_jal_imm(value) \
> > > + (((value & (RV_J_IMM_10_1_MASK << RV_J_IMM_10_1_OFF)) << RV_I_IMM_11_0_OPOFF) | \
> > > + ((value & (RV_J_IMM_11_MASK << RV_J_IMM_11_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_11_OPOFF) | \
> > > + ((value & (RV_J_IMM_19_12_OPOFF << RV_J_IMM_19_12_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_19_12_OPOFF) | \
> > > + ((value & (1 << RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OPOFF))
> > > +
> > > +void riscv_alternative_fix_jal(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len,
> > > + int patch_offset)
> > > +{
> >
> > I think we might want to unfiy this into a common function like
> >
> > riscv_alternative_fix_offsets(...)
> >
> > so that we only run through the code block once
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < num_instr; i++) {
> > if (riscv_insn_is_auipc_jalr(inst1, inst2)) {
> > riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(...)
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > if (riscv_insn_is_jal(inst)) {
> > riscv_alternative_fix_jal(...)
> > continue;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > This would also remove the need from calling multiple functions
> > after patching alternatives.
>
> Yesterday, I also wanted to unify the two instruction fix into
> one. But that would need to roll back the
> riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr() to your v1 version. And IMHO,
> it's better if you can split the Zbb string optimizations series
> into two: one for alternative improvements, another for Zbb. Then
> we may get the alternative improvements and this inst extension
> series merged in v6.2-rc1.
Heiko, perhaps you can correct me here:
Last Wednesday you & Palmer agreed that it was too late in the cycle to
apply any of the stuff touching alternatives?
If I do recall correctly, gives plenty of time to sort out any
interdependent changes here.
Could easily be misremembering, wouldn't be the first time!
Thanks,
Conor.
> > > + int num_instr = len / sizeof(u32);
> > > + unsigned int call;
> > > + int i;
> > > + int imm;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < num_instr; i++) {
> > > + u32 inst = riscv_instruction_at(alt_ptr, i);
> > > +
> > > + if (!riscv_insn_is_jal(inst))
> > > + continue;
> > > +
> > > + /* get and adjust new target address */
> > > + imm = RV_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM(inst);
> > > + imm -= patch_offset;
> > > +
> > > + /* pick the original jal */
> > > + call = inst;
> > > +
> > > + /* drop the old IMMs, all jal imm bits sit at 31:12 */
> > > + call &= ~GENMASK(31, 12);
> > > +
> > > + /* add the adapted IMMs */
> > > + call |= to_jal_imm(imm);
> > > +
> > > + /* patch the call place again */
> > > + patch_text_nosync(alt_ptr + i * sizeof(u32), &call, 4);
> > > + }
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * This is called very early in the boot process (directly after we run
> > > * a feature detect on the boot CPU). No need to worry about other CPUs
> > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > index ba62a4ff5ccd..c743f0adc794 100644
> > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > > @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin,
> > > riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(alt->old_ptr,
> > > alt->alt_len,
> > > alt->old_ptr - alt->alt_ptr);
> > > + riscv_alternative_fix_jal(alt->old_ptr,
> > > + alt->alt_len,
> > > + alt->old_ptr - alt->alt_ptr);
> > > }
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-05 18:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-04 17:46 [PATCH v2 00/13] riscv: improve boot time isa extensions handling Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 14:57 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-05 15:34 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 16:42 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 16:49 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 5:50 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-05 15:31 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-12-05 15:40 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 18:36 ` Conor Dooley [this message]
2022-12-05 18:49 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-12-05 19:49 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-06 0:39 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-12-06 15:02 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 16:12 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-19 21:32 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 02/13] riscv: move riscv_noncoherent_supported() out of ZICBOM probe Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-04 21:52 ` Heiko Stübner
2022-12-05 15:16 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 15:31 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 03/13] riscv: cpufeature: detect RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT earlier Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 19:09 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 04/13] riscv: hwcap: make ISA extension ids can be used in asm Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 18:53 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-22 22:58 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 05/13] riscv: cpufeature: extend riscv_cpufeature_patch_func to all ISA extensions Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 19:37 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 06/13] riscv: introduce riscv_has_extension_[un]likely() Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 20:25 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 07/13] riscv: fpu: switch has_fpu() to riscv_has_extension_likely() Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 08/13] riscv: module: move find_section to module.h Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 15:25 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-06 20:44 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 09/13] riscv: switch to relative alternative entries Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 0:51 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-05 15:18 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 4:34 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-06 14:50 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 21:43 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 10/13] riscv: alternative: patch alternatives in the vDSO Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 1:56 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-05 15:23 ` Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-06 4:29 ` Guo Ren
2023-01-11 14:12 ` Andrew Jones
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 11/13] riscv: cpu_relax: switch to riscv_has_extension_likely() Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 0:52 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-06 22:04 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 12/13] riscv: KVM: Switch has_svinval() to riscv_has_extension_unlikely() Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 0:52 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-04 17:46 ` [PATCH v2 13/13] riscv: remove riscv_isa_ext_keys[] array and related usage Jisheng Zhang
2022-12-05 0:53 ` Guo Ren
2022-12-06 22:16 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y446PdlUPGw5iB71@spud \
--to=conor@kernel.org \
--cc=ajones@ventanamicro.com \
--cc=anup@brainfault.org \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atishp@atishpatra.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).