From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC13C4321E for ; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232516AbiLEQy3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:54:29 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232384AbiLEQyH (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Dec 2022 11:54:07 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [145.40.68.75]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5420F1EC79; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 08:52:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08214B81181; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:52:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 20FE4C433C1; Mon, 5 Dec 2022 16:52:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1670259128; bh=z206kRNGIXiQi/EhT74kSsNhf2J44/YoxKH1hy07zdk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=CwYmsL0bwPai3AbTFP00DnwviFa2kbW9Tz8D7XTgzmMWD7hiMPRdyn7ZLAiOMBRfs aqqJ72gvKtzXhnno3lc6nUQGgIQl6pZRmGYXRZDVjk9grRVugSqzyu0PMYt3mmPf3m Ps9tK+ZVtQ8ZR5r5+nFJNqCA+GJvwUqKVt/vcaJ1CQdRwV4gNChEaPSEKOy93TExqa w7CJ04kSNt1GtLhNYEahH1dc+F4ERdr57GOPXKr69A15sd+rXeWl72kTGaM8Ocazjy mbJdfA1G2slcqiTcNSUU5hni5B4DVL7WjTby9tenHz4JrPq59RBuVzG97FBtCAZ3ym H0pX/5PTEAKEw== Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2022 00:42:11 +0800 From: Jisheng Zhang To: Andrew Jones Cc: Palmer Dabbelt , Paul Walmsley , Albert Ou , Anup Patel , Atish Patra , Heiko Stuebner , linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/13] riscv: fix jal offsets in patched alternatives Message-ID: References: <20221204174632.3677-1-jszhang@kernel.org> <20221204174632.3677-2-jszhang@kernel.org> <20221205145710.xzb4prrc44gv7mwm@kamzik> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20221205145710.xzb4prrc44gv7mwm@kamzik> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 03:57:10PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2022 at 01:46:20AM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote: > > Alternatives live in a different section, so offsets used by jal > > instruction will point to wrong locations after the patch got applied. > > > > Similar to arm64, adjust the location to consider that offset. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang > > --- > > arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h | 2 ++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 3 +++ > > 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h > > index c58ec3cc4bc3..33eae9541684 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/alternative.h > > @@ -29,6 +29,8 @@ void apply_module_alternatives(void *start, size_t length); > > > > void riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len, > > int patch_offset); > > +void riscv_alternative_fix_jal(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len, > > + int patch_offset); > > > > struct alt_entry { > > void *old_ptr; /* address of original instruciton or data */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c > > index 292cc42dc3be..9d88375624b5 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c > > @@ -125,6 +125,44 @@ void riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len, > > } > > } > > > > +#define to_jal_imm(value) \ > > + (((value & (RV_J_IMM_10_1_MASK << RV_J_IMM_10_1_OFF)) << RV_I_IMM_11_0_OPOFF) | \ > ^ RV_J_IMM_10_1_OPOFF > > > + ((value & (RV_J_IMM_11_MASK << RV_J_IMM_11_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_11_OPOFF) | \ > > + ((value & (RV_J_IMM_19_12_OPOFF << RV_J_IMM_19_12_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_19_12_OPOFF) | \ > > + ((value & (1 << RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OFF)) << RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OPOFF)) Hi all, I believe there's bug in the to_jal_imm() macro implementation, the correct one should be like this: #define to_jal_imm(value) \ ((RV_X(value, RV_J_IMM_10_1_OFF, RV_J_IMM_10_1_MASK) << RV_J_IMM_10_1_OPOFF) | \ (RV_X(value, RV_J_IMM_11_OFF, RV_J_IMM_11_MASK) << RV_J_IMM_11_OPOFF) | \ (RV_X(value, RV_J_IMM_19_12_OFF, RV_J_IMM_19_12_MASK) << RV_J_IMM_19_12_OPOFF) | \ (RV_X(value, RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OFF, 1) << RV_J_IMM_SIGN_OPOFF)) Will fix it in next version. Thanks > > Should put () around value > > > + > > +void riscv_alternative_fix_jal(void *alt_ptr, unsigned int len, > > + int patch_offset) > > +{ > > + int num_instr = len / sizeof(u32); > > + unsigned int call; > > + int i; > > + int imm; > > + > > + for (i = 0; i < num_instr; i++) { > > + u32 inst = riscv_instruction_at(alt_ptr, i); > > + > > + if (!riscv_insn_is_jal(inst)) > > + continue; > > + > > + /* get and adjust new target address */ > > + imm = RV_EXTRACT_JTYPE_IMM(inst); > > + imm -= patch_offset; > > + > > + /* pick the original jal */ > > + call = inst; > > + > > + /* drop the old IMMs, all jal imm bits sit at 31:12 */ > > + call &= ~GENMASK(31, 12); > > It'd be nice if this had a define. > > > + > > + /* add the adapted IMMs */ > > + call |= to_jal_imm(imm); > > + > > + /* patch the call place again */ > > + patch_text_nosync(alt_ptr + i * sizeof(u32), &call, 4); > > + } > > +} > > + > > /* > > * This is called very early in the boot process (directly after we run > > * a feature detect on the boot CPU). No need to worry about other CPUs > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > index ba62a4ff5ccd..c743f0adc794 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c > > @@ -324,6 +324,9 @@ void __init_or_module riscv_cpufeature_patch_func(struct alt_entry *begin, > > riscv_alternative_fix_auipc_jalr(alt->old_ptr, > > alt->alt_len, > > alt->old_ptr - alt->alt_ptr); > > + riscv_alternative_fix_jal(alt->old_ptr, > > + alt->alt_len, > > + alt->old_ptr - alt->alt_ptr); > > } > > } > > } > > -- > > 2.37.2 > > > > Thanks, > drew