From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yu Zhang <yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Aaron Lewis <aaronlewis@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Fix 2nd exec controls override goofs
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2022 00:18:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y5pn2fYf5eHu8yCb@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221214030037.4qz6v6fvfx6of32n@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, Yu Zhang wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2022 at 06:23:02AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > Fix bugs in KVM's (mis)handling of secondary execution controls.
> >
> > KVM overrides the secondary execution control VMX MSR during KVM_SET_CPUID.
> > Similar to the somewhat recent reverts
> >
> > 8805875aa473 ("Revert "KVM: nVMX: Do not expose MPX VMX controls when guest MPX disabled"")
> > 9389d5774aca ("Revert "KVM: nVMX: Expose load IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL VM-{Entry,Exit} control"")
> >
> > undo misguided KVM behavior where KVM overrides allowed-1 settings in the
> > secondary execution controls in response to changes to the guest's CPUID
> > model. To avoid breaking userspace that doesn't take ownership of the
> > VMX MSRs, go hands off if and only if userpace sets the MSR in question.
> >
> > Before fixing that, fix another bug it was hiding where the umwait/tpause
> > control was being exposed to L1 for nVMX only after KVM_SET_CPUID, and
> > harden KVM against similar bugs in the future.
> >
> > v2: Fix the ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE bug too. [Aaron]
> >
> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221110005706.1064832-1-seanjc@google.com
> >
> > Sean Christopherson (4):
> > KVM: nVMX: Properly expose ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE control to L1
> > KVM: nVMX: Don't stuff secondary execution control if it's not
> > supported
> > KVM: nVMX: Don't muck with allowed sec exec controls on CPUID changes
> > KVM: selftests: Test KVM's handling of VMX's sec exec MSR on
> > KVM_SET_CPUID
>
> BTW, we may need another patch to remove the obsolete comments in
> nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs():
Ouch, indeed. Want to send a proper patch? Or provide your SoB and I'll write
a changelog?
The comment was added by commit 80154d77c922 ("KVM: VMX: cache secondary exec controls"),
but arguably the below is the appropriate Fixes, as it's the commit that fixed the
existing cases where KVM didn't enumerate supported-but-conditional controls.
Fixes: 6defc591846d ("KVM: nVMX: include conditional controls in /dev/kvm KVM_GET_MSRS")
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b6f4411b613e..42ceddcafd3e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -6854,11 +6854,6 @@ void nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf, u32 ept_caps)
> msrs->procbased_ctls_low &=
> ~(CPU_BASED_CR3_LOAD_EXITING | CPU_BASED_CR3_STORE_EXITING);
>
> - /*
> - * secondary cpu-based controls. Do not include those that
> - * depend on CPUID bits, they are added later by
> - * vmx_vcpu_after_set_cpuid.
> - */
> msrs->secondary_ctls_low = 0;
>
> msrs->secondary_ctls_high = vmcs_conf->cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl;
>
> B.R.
> Yu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-15 0:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-13 6:23 [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Fix 2nd exec controls override goofs Sean Christopherson
2022-12-13 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] KVM: nVMX: Properly expose ENABLE_USR_WAIT_PAUSE control to L1 Sean Christopherson
2022-12-13 10:26 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-13 18:08 ` Jim Mattson
2022-12-13 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] KVM: nVMX: Don't stuff secondary execution control if it's not supported Sean Christopherson
2022-12-13 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] KVM: nVMX: Don't muck with allowed sec exec controls on CPUID changes Sean Christopherson
2022-12-23 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2023-01-04 14:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-04 14:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-13 6:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] KVM: selftests: Test KVM's handling of VMX's sec exec MSR on KVM_SET_CPUID Sean Christopherson
2022-12-14 3:00 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] KVM: nVMX: Fix 2nd exec controls override goofs Yu Zhang
2022-12-15 0:18 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-12-15 11:24 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-15 18:33 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-16 9:59 ` Yu Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y5pn2fYf5eHu8yCb@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=aaronlewis@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=yu.c.zhang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox