From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
cohuck@redhat.com, borntraeger@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
pasic@linux.ibm.com, zhenyuw@linux.intel.com,
zhi.a.wang@intel.com, hch@infradead.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2023 20:32:38 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7dsJpudKGtM0kbl@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5e17a35d-2a94-f482-c466-521afcab80b8@linux.ibm.com>
On Thu, Jan 05, 2023 at 07:16:37PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Yeah, this is also what I was thinking, replace the direct
> kvm_put_kvm calls with, say, schedule_delayed_work in each driver,
> where the delayed task just does the kvm_put_kvm (along with a brief
> comment explaining why we handle the put asynchronously).
Don't put that in every driver, do something like mmput_async() where
the core code has all of this.
> Other than that.. The goal of this patch originally was to get the
> kvm reference at first open_device and release it with the very last
> close_device, so the only other option I could think of would be to
> take the responsibility back from the vfio drivers and do the
> kvm_get_kvm and kvm_put_kvm directly in vfio_main after dropping the
> (but that would result in some ugly symbol linkage and would acquire
> kvm references that a driver maybe does not care about so I don't
> really like that idea)
And we still have the deadlock problem anyhow..
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-06 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-19 18:33 [PATCH v3 0/1] vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM Matthew Rosato
2022-05-19 18:33 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] " Matthew Rosato
2022-05-20 5:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2022-05-20 13:36 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-20 13:56 ` Tony Krowiak
2022-05-20 14:09 ` Matthew Rosato
2022-05-20 20:59 ` Tony Krowiak
2022-05-23 16:41 ` Alex Williamson
2022-05-24 11:39 ` Wang, Zhi A
2023-01-05 22:09 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-05 23:34 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2023-01-06 0:16 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-06 0:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-06 1:03 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-06 14:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-05-24 16:07 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] " Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7dsJpudKGtM0kbl@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).