From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Jingqi Liu <jingqi.liu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Rename get_cr3() --> get_pgd() and clear high bits for pgd
Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2023 00:45:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y7jAjXcjDXlgAX+0@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221209044557.1496580-4-robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Dec 09, 2022, Robert Hoo wrote:
> The get_cr3() is the implementation of kvm_mmu::get_guest_pgd(), well, CR3
> cannot be naturally equivalent to pgd, SDM says CR3 high bits are reserved,
> must be zero.
> And now, with LAM feature's introduction, bit 61 ~ 62 are used.
> So, rename get_cr3() --> get_pgd() to better indicate function purpose and
> in it, filtered out CR3 high bits.
Depends on one's interpreation of "PGD". KVM says it's the full thing, e.g. the
nEPT hook returns the full EPTP, not EP4TA (or EP5TA). I don't think stripping
bits in get_cr3() is the right approach, e.g. the user might want the full thing
for comparison. E.g. the PCID bits are left as is.
Changing get_cr3() but not nested_svm_get_tdp_cr3() and nested_ept_get_eptp() is
also weird.
I think my preference would be to strip the LAM bits in the few places that want
the physical address and keep get_cr3() as is.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-07 0:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-09 4:45 [PATCH v3 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] KVM: x86: Rename cr4_reserved/rsvd_* variables to be more readable Robert Hoo
2022-12-28 3:37 ` Binbin Wu
2022-12-29 1:42 ` Robert Hoo
2023-01-07 0:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-07 13:30 ` Robert Hoo
2023-01-08 14:18 ` Xiaoyao Li
2023-01-09 3:07 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] KVM: x86: Add CR4.LAM_SUP in guest owned bits Robert Hoo
2023-01-07 0:38 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-07 13:32 ` Robert Hoo
2023-01-09 16:29 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-10 3:56 ` Robert Hoo
2023-01-11 17:35 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Rename get_cr3() --> get_pgd() and clear high bits for pgd Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 6:44 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-20 14:07 ` Robert Hoo
2023-01-07 0:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2023-01-07 13:36 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Commets update Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] KVM: x86: MMU: Integrate LAM bits when build guest CR3 Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 6:53 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-20 14:07 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 2:12 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 7:50 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 8:55 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] KVM: x86: Untag LAM bits when applicable Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 7:32 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-20 14:07 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 9:45 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-20 14:07 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 2:38 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 8:02 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 8:49 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 10:10 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 10:30 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 12:40 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-22 8:21 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-23 2:36 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-23 3:55 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 0:35 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-21 1:38 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 2:55 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 8:22 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 9:35 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 10:22 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 10:33 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-21 8:14 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 8:37 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-28 8:32 ` Binbin Wu
2022-12-29 0:41 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] KVM: x86: When judging setting CR3 valid or not, consider LAM bits Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] KVM: x86: When guest set CR3, handle LAM bits semantics Robert Hoo
2022-12-20 9:10 ` Liu, Jingqi
2022-12-20 14:16 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-21 8:30 ` Yu Zhang
2022-12-21 12:52 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-09 4:45 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] KVM: x86: LAM: Expose LAM CPUID to user space VMM Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 6:12 ` [PATCH v3 0/9] Linear Address Masking (LAM) KVM Enabling Robert Hoo
2022-12-19 8:09 ` Yuan Yao
2022-12-20 14:06 ` Robert Hoo
2022-12-20 9:20 ` Liu, Jingqi
2022-12-20 14:19 ` Robert Hoo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y7jAjXcjDXlgAX+0@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jingqi.liu@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=robert.hu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox