From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
cohuck@redhat.com, farman@linux.ibm.com, pmorel@linux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com,
imbrenda@linux.ibm.com, david@redhat.com, akrowiak@linux.ibm.com,
jjherne@linux.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com,
zhenyuw@linux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, seanjc@google.com,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] vfio: fix potential deadlock on vfio group lock
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2023 11:03:42 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y8VnTu2cNfoYmbv4@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230114000351.115444-1-mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 07:03:51PM -0500, Matthew Rosato wrote:
> Currently it is possible that the final put of a KVM reference comes from
> vfio during its device close operation. This occurs while the vfio group
> lock is held; however, if the vfio device is still in the kvm device list,
> then the following call chain could result in a deadlock:
>
> kvm_put_kvm
> -> kvm_destroy_vm
> -> kvm_destroy_devices
> -> kvm_vfio_destroy
> -> kvm_vfio_file_set_kvm
> -> vfio_file_set_kvm
> -> group->group_lock/group_rwsem
>
> Avoid this scenario by having vfio core code acquire a KVM reference
> the first time a device is opened and hold that reference until right
> after the group lock is released after the last device is closed.
>
> Fixes: 421cfe6596f6 ("vfio: remove VFIO_GROUP_NOTIFY_SET_KVM")
> Reported-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@linux.ibm.com>
> ---
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-16 15:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-14 0:03 [PATCH v4] vfio: fix potential deadlock on vfio group lock Matthew Rosato
2023-01-16 15:03 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2023-01-17 9:05 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-01-17 21:22 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-18 9:03 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-01-18 14:55 ` Matthew Rosato
2023-01-19 3:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-01-19 19:05 ` Alex Williamson
2023-01-18 14:15 ` Matthew Rosato
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y8VnTu2cNfoYmbv4@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=akrowiak@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=farman@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=frankja@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=imbrenda@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjrosato@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=pmorel@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=zhenyuw@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zhi.a.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox