From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE8BC32793 for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:22:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231615AbjARPWr (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:22:47 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:54512 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S230181AbjARPWW (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:22:22 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25A014DCCD for ; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 07:18:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1674055083; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fxqiyPyz0bm5LMmALWpRHR+Gt7Wpl/8XB6QOPfhNxGs=; b=bwHErAME2w7icybTg4dn2JOXQ5FSsIT9B9Po/nFD8TXa+soD+sqow3tuRhli2WuaXAaDQN CFF91SnRqRTLdGinbL1pgvh0Pcg0Gq1WuSua0ZkdsDhD5dkbpHS4t45jv48tiOMAFLpwUY Rzz7cxuCwWMNkaawb+ScnP8vNI1ur3E= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-187-f7ifZX39OSGXgg5Rf4Dc1g-1; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 10:18:02 -0500 X-MC-Unique: f7ifZX39OSGXgg5Rf4Dc1g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AFBF8A011D; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from redhat.com (unknown [10.39.194.202]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6907140EBF5; Wed, 18 Jan 2023 15:17:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2023 16:17:55 +0100 From: Kevin Wolf To: Thomas Huth Cc: Nina Schoetterl-Glausch , Pierre Morel , qemu-s390x@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com, richard.henderson@linaro.org, david@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ehabkost@redhat.com, marcel.apfelbaum@gmail.com, eblake@redhat.com, armbru@redhat.com, seiden@linux.ibm.com, nrb@linux.ibm.com, frankja@linux.ibm.com, berrange@redhat.com, clg@kaod.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Stefan Hajnoczi , hreitz@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 08/11] qapi/s390/cpu topology: change-topology monitor command Message-ID: References: <20230105145313.168489-1-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <20230105145313.168489-9-pmorel@linux.ibm.com> <72baa5b42abe557cdf123889b33b845b405cc86c.camel@linux.ibm.com> <5654d88fb7d000369c6cfdbe0213ca9d2bfe013b.camel@linux.ibm.com> <91566c93-a422-7969-1f7e-80c6f3d214f1@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91566c93-a422-7969-1f7e-80c6f3d214f1@redhat.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: kvm@vger.kernel.org Am 18.01.2023 um 11:53 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: > On 17/01/2023 14.31, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: > > On Tue, 2023-01-17 at 08:30 +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > > > On 16/01/2023 22.09, Nina Schoetterl-Glausch wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2023-01-05 at 15:53 +0100, Pierre Morel wrote: > > > > > The modification of the CPU attributes are done through a monitor > > > > > commands. > > > > > > > > > > It allows to move the core inside the topology tree to optimise > > > > > the cache usage in the case the host's hypervizor previously > > > > > moved the CPU. > > > > > > > > > > The same command allows to modifiy the CPU attributes modifiers > > > > > like polarization entitlement and the dedicated attribute to notify > > > > > the guest if the host admin modified scheduling or dedication of a vCPU. > > > > > > > > > > With this knowledge the guest has the possibility to optimize the > > > > > usage of the vCPUs. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel > > > > > --- > ... > > > > > + s390_topology.sockets[s390_socket_nb(id)]--; > > > > > > > > I suppose this function cannot run concurrently, so the same CPU doesn't get removed twice. > > > > > > QEMU has the so-called BQL - the Big Qemu Lock. Instructions handlers are > > > normally called with the lock taken, see qemu_mutex_lock_iothread() in > > > target/s390x/kvm/kvm.c. > > > > That is good to know, but is that the relevant lock here? > > We don't want to concurrent qmp commands. I looked at the code and it's pretty complicated. > > Not sure, but I believe that QMP commands are executed from the main > iothread, so I think this should be safe? ... CC:-ing some more people who > might know the correct answer. In general yes, QMP commands are processed one after another in the main thread while holding the BQL. And I think this is the relevant case for you. The exception is out-of-band commands, which I think run in the monitor thread while some other (normal) command could be processed. OOB commands are quite limited in what they are allowed to do, though, and there aren't many of them. They are mainly meant to fix situations where something (including other QMP commands) got stuck. Kevin