public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@gmail.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add AMD CPUID ExtPerfMonAndDbg leaf 0x80000022
Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2023 00:16:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9B0zgliB9BMPK1l@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221111102645.82001-8-likexu@tencent.com>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2022, Like Xu wrote:
> From: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> 
> CPUID leaf 0x80000022 i.e. ExtPerfMonAndDbg advertises some new
> performance monitoring features for AMD processors.
> 
> Bit 0 of EAX indicates support for Performance Monitoring Version 2
> (PerfMonV2) features. If found to be set during PMU initialization,
> the EBX bits of the same CPUID function can be used to determine
> the number of available PMCs for different PMU types.
> 
> Expose the relevant bits via KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID so that
> guests can make use of the PerfMonV2 features.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sandipan Das <sandipan.das@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Like Xu <likexu@tencent.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c   | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 11 ++++++++---
>  2 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> index 6b5912578edd..df551fa66ccc 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
> @@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
>  		entry->edx = 0;
>  		break;
>  	case 0x80000000:
> -		entry->eax = min(entry->eax, 0x80000021);
> +		entry->eax = min(entry->eax, 0x80000022);
>  		/*
>  		 * Serializing LFENCE is reported in a multitude of ways, and
>  		 * NullSegClearsBase is not reported in CPUID on Zen2; help
> @@ -1229,6 +1229,34 @@ static inline int __do_cpuid_func(struct kvm_cpuid_array *array, u32 function)
>  		if (!static_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_NULL_SEG))
>  			entry->eax |= BIT(6);
>  		break;
> +	/* AMD Extended Performance Monitoring and Debug */
> +	case 0x80000022: {
> +		union cpuid_0x80000022_ebx ebx;
> +
> +		entry->ecx = entry->edx = 0;
> +		if (!enable_pmu || !kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2)) {
> +			entry->eax = entry->ebx;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		cpuid_entry_override(entry, CPUID_8000_0022_EAX);
> +
> +		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2))
> +			ebx.split.num_core_pmc = min(kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp,
> +						     KVM_AMD_PMC_MAX_GENERIC);

Similar to the previous patch, sanitizing kvm_pmu_cap.num_counters_gp should be
handled during PMU initialization.

> +
> +		if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE))
> +			ebx.split.num_core_pmc = max_t(unsigned int,
> +						       ebx.split.num_core_pmc,
> +						       AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS_CORE);
> +		else
> +			ebx.split.num_core_pmc = max_t(unsigned int,
> +						       ebx.split.num_core_pmc,
> +						       AMD64_NUM_COUNTERS);

Again like the previous patch, I would expect this to be an if-elif-else sequence.

> +
> +		entry->ebx = ebx.full;
> +		break;
> +	}
>  	/*Add support for Centaur's CPUID instruction*/
>  	case 0xC0000000:
>  		/*Just support up to 0xC0000004 now*/
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 527f18d8cc44..127983ab8307 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -4914,9 +4914,14 @@ static __init void svm_set_cpu_caps(void)
>  	    boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_AMD_SSBD))
>  		kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_VIRT_SSBD);
>  
> -	/* AMD PMU PERFCTR_CORE CPUID */
> -	if (enable_pmu && boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE))
> -		kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE);

Another existing wart.  This existing code can be:

	if (enable_pmu)
		kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE)

Can you add a patch to do that minor cleanup?  Then this patch can yield:

	if (enable_pmu) {
		kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE);
		kvm_cpu_cap_check_and_set(X86_FEATURE_PERFMON_V2);
	}

KVM's reverse-CPUID magic should Just Work for PERFMON_V2 even though it's scattered.
		

> +	if (enable_pmu) {
> +		/* AMD PMU PERFCTR_CORE CPUID */
> +		if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE))
> +			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_PERFCTR_CORE);
> +		/* KVM only support AMD PerfMon V2 */
> +		if (kvm_pmu_cap.version > 1)
> +			kvm_cpu_cap_set(X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* CPUID 0x8000001F (SME/SEV features) */
>  	sev_set_cpu_caps();
> -- 
> 2.38.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-25  0:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-11 10:26 [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: x86: Add AMD Guest PerfMonV2 PMU support Like Xu
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rename pmc_is_enabled() to pmc_is_globally_enabled() Like Xu
2023-01-27  2:03   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-02 11:46     ` Like Xu
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] KVM: VMX: Refactor intel_pmu_set_msr() to align with other set_msr() helpers Like Xu
2023-01-27  2:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Rewrite reprogram_counters() to improve performance Like Xu
2023-01-20  1:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-24 20:16   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] KVM: x86/pmu: Make part of the Intel v2 PMU MSRs handling x86 generic Like Xu
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add X86_FEATURE_AMD_PMU_V2 as a KVM-only leaf entry Like Xu
2023-01-24 19:47   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-06 11:47     ` Like Xu
2023-02-10  1:32       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] KVM: x86/svm/pmu: Add AMD PerfMonV2 support Like Xu
2023-01-25  0:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-02-06  7:53     ` Like Xu
2023-02-06 22:22       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Add AMD CPUID ExtPerfMonAndDbg leaf 0x80000022 Like Xu
2023-01-25  0:16   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-11 10:26 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] KVM: x86/cpuid: Use fast return for cpuid "0xa" leaf when !enable_pmu Like Xu
2023-01-20  1:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-06  8:32 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] KVM: x86: Add AMD Guest PerfMonV2 PMU support Like Xu
2023-01-20  1:13 ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9B0zgliB9BMPK1l@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox