From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, like.xu.linux@gmail.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:04:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125040604.5051-11-weijiang.yang@intel.com>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, Yang Weijiang wrote:
> return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b28be793de29..59bdd9873fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2360,6 +2360,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
> if (guest_efer != host_efer)
> exec_control |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> }
> +
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + exec_control &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL;
> +
> vm_entry_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>
> /*
> @@ -2374,6 +2378,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
> exec_control |= VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> else
> exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> +
> + if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL;
This is wrong. If KVM doesn't enumerate suport to L1, then L1's value needs to
be preserved on entry/exit to/from L1<->L2. I.e. just delete these lines.
> vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>
> /*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 2ab4c33b5008..359da38a19a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER, VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER },
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS },
> { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL },
> + { VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL, VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL },
> };
>
> memset(vmcs_conf, 0, sizeof(*vmcs_conf));
> @@ -4794,6 +4795,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
> vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>
> vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx);
> +
> + if (!init_event && cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> + vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);
This belongs in init_vmcs().
> }
>
> static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -6191,6 +6195,10 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL)
> pr_err("PerfGlobCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL));
> + if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&
Follow every other field and check the VMCS support, not the cap.
> + vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
> + pr_err("ArchLBRCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> + vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL));
> if (vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)
> pr_err("BndCfgS = 0x%016llx\n", vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS));
> pr_err("Interruptibility = %08x ActivityState = %08x\n",
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index a3da84f4ea45..f68c8a53a248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
> VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER | \
> VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS | \
> VM_ENTRY_PT_CONCEAL_PIP | \
> - VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> + VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL | \
> + VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
>
> #define __KVM_REQUIRED_VMX_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS \
> (VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS | \
> @@ -515,7 +516,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
> VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER | \
> VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS | \
> VM_EXIT_PT_CONCEAL_PIP | \
> - VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> + VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL | \
> + VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL)
Enabling these flags by default is wrong. KVM will clear LBR_CTL on VM-Exit when
arch LBRs are supported, and AFAICT, never restore the host's values. And that
will happen regardless of whether or not the guest is using arch LBRs. I assume
the correct approach is to toggle these fields, but I'll be damned if I can figure
out what the intended behavior of the existing LBR suport is. I'll follow up in
the cover letter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-27 22:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-25 4:05 [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 10:57 ` Like Xu
2022-12-22 13:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-12-22 17:41 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-23 2:12 ` Like Xu
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2023-01-26 19:50 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 6:33 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: PMU: disable LBR handling if architectural LBR is available Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 20:10 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 8:10 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:00 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:30 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:15 ` Like Xu
2023-01-27 20:25 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 11:46 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:09 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:27 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:19 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:16 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:24 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:08 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:42 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: VMX: Support passthrough of architectural LBRs Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:43 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:27 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:37 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:06 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:28 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:04 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:07 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:13 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Disable Arch LBREn bit in #DB and warm reset Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:22 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:12 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:09 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:09 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Save/Restore guest Arch LBR Ctrl msr at SMM entry/exit Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:11 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:50 ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:13 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:46 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-30 17:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 13:14 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-31 16:05 ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25 4:06 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:03 ` Like Xu
2022-12-25 4:31 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:15 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-12 1:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:38 ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-06-05 9:50 ` Like Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com \
--to=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
--cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).