kvm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Yang Weijiang <weijiang.yang@intel.com>
Cc: pbonzini@redhat.com, jmattson@google.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, like.xu.linux@gmail.com,
	kan.liang@linux.intel.com, wei.w.wang@intel.com,
	Like Xu <like.xu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2023 22:04:24 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221125040604.5051-11-weijiang.yang@intel.com>

On Thu, Nov 24, 2022, Yang Weijiang wrote:
>  	return vmcs_config.cpu_based_2nd_exec_ctrl &
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> index b28be793de29..59bdd9873fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c
> @@ -2360,6 +2360,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>  		if (guest_efer != host_efer)
>  			exec_control |= VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
>  	}
> +
> +	if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		exec_control &= ~VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL;
> +
>  	vm_entry_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -2374,6 +2378,10 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02_early(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx, struct loaded_vmcs *vmcs0
>  		exec_control |= VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
>  	else
>  		exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER;
> +
> +	if (cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		exec_control &= ~VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL;

This is wrong.  If KVM doesn't enumerate suport to L1, then L1's value needs to
be preserved on entry/exit to/from L1<->L2.  I.e. just delete these lines.

>  	vm_exit_controls_set(vmx, exec_control);
>  
>  	/*
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> index 2ab4c33b5008..359da38a19a1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c
> @@ -2599,6 +2599,7 @@ static __init int setup_vmcs_config(struct vmcs_config *vmcs_conf,
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER,		VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER },
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS,		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS },
>  		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL,		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL },
> +		{ VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL, 		VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL },
>  	};
>  
>  	memset(vmcs_conf, 0, sizeof(*vmcs_conf));
> @@ -4794,6 +4795,9 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  	vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid);
>  
>  	vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx);
> +
> +	if (!init_event && cpu_has_vmx_arch_lbr())
> +		vmcs_write64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL, 0);

This belongs in init_vmcs().

>  }
>  
>  static void vmx_enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> @@ -6191,6 +6195,10 @@ void dump_vmcs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	    vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL)
>  		pr_err("PerfGlobCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
>  		       vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_PERF_GLOBAL_CTRL));
> +	if (kvm_cpu_cap_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_LBR) &&

Follow every other field and check the VMCS support, not the cap.

> +	    vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
> +		pr_err("ArchLBRCtl = 0x%016llx\n",
> +		       vmcs_read64(GUEST_IA32_LBR_CTL));
>  	if (vmentry_ctl & VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS)
>  		pr_err("BndCfgS = 0x%016llx\n", vmcs_read64(GUEST_BNDCFGS));
>  	pr_err("Interruptibility = %08x  ActivityState = %08x\n",

...

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> index a3da84f4ea45..f68c8a53a248 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h
> @@ -493,7 +493,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
>  	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_EFER |					\
>  	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_BNDCFGS |					\
>  	 VM_ENTRY_PT_CONCEAL_PIP |					\
> -	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> +	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_RTIT_CTL |					\
> +	 VM_ENTRY_LOAD_IA32_LBR_CTL)
>  
>  #define __KVM_REQUIRED_VMX_VM_EXIT_CONTROLS				\
>  	(VM_EXIT_SAVE_DEBUG_CONTROLS |					\
> @@ -515,7 +516,8 @@ static inline u8 vmx_get_rvi(void)
>  	       VM_EXIT_LOAD_IA32_EFER |					\
>  	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_BNDCFGS |					\
>  	       VM_EXIT_PT_CONCEAL_PIP |					\
> -	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL)
> +	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_RTIT_CTL |				\
> +	       VM_EXIT_CLEAR_IA32_LBR_CTL)

Enabling these flags by default is wrong.  KVM will clear LBR_CTL on VM-Exit when
arch LBRs are supported, and AFAICT, never restore the host's values.  And that
will happen regardless of whether or not the guest is using arch LBRs.  I assume
the correct approach is to toggle these fields, but I'll be damned if I can figure
out what the intended behavior of the existing LBR suport is.  I'll follow up in
the cover letter.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-27 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-11-25  4:05 [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] perf/x86/lbr: Simplify the exposure check for the LBR_INFO registers Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 10:57   ` Like Xu
2022-12-22 13:29     ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-12-22 17:41     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-23  2:12       ` Like Xu
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] KVM: x86: Report XSS as an MSR to be saved if there are supported features Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] KVM: x86: Refresh CPUID on writes to MSR_IA32_XSS Yang Weijiang
2023-01-26 19:50   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30  6:33     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] KVM: PMU: disable LBR handling if architectural LBR is available Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 20:10   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30  8:10     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_DEPTH for guest Arch LBR Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:00   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:30     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:15   ` Like Xu
2023-01-27 20:25   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 11:46     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] KVM: vmx/pmu: Emulate MSR_ARCH_LBR_CTL " Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:09   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:27     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:19   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:16     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:24   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:08     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:42   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] KVM: VMX: Support passthrough of architectural LBRs Yang Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR MSRs to msrs_to_save_all list Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:43   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:27     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] KVM: x86: Refine the matching and clearing logic for supported_xss Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 21:46   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:37     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:05 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Check Arch LBR config when return perf capabilities Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:06   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:28     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:04   ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] KVM: x86: Add XSAVE Support for Architectural LBR Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:07   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:13     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Disable Arch LBREn bit in #DB and warm reset Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:22   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:12     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:09   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:09     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] KVM: x86/vmx: Save/Restore guest Arch LBR Ctrl msr at SMM entry/exit Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:11   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:50     ` Yang, Weijiang
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] KVM: x86: Add Arch LBR data MSR access interface Yang Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:13   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 12:46     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-30 17:30       ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-31 13:14         ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-31 16:05           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-11-25  4:06 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] KVM: x86/cpuid: Advertise Arch LBR feature in CPUID Yang Weijiang
2022-12-22 11:03   ` Like Xu
2022-12-25  4:31     ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:15   ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-12  1:57 ` [PATCH v2 00/15] Introduce Architectural LBR for vPMU Yang, Weijiang
2023-01-27 22:46 ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-30 13:38   ` Yang, Weijiang
2023-06-05  9:50   ` Like Xu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Y9RKaEzZ9tSKW1ZB@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=like.xu.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=like.xu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wei.w.wang@intel.com \
    --cc=weijiang.yang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).