Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/26] KVM SGX virtualization support

Paolo Bonzini
2021-01-20T16:45:03Z

On 20/01/21 17:35, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
>> I'd like to take this chance to ask: when this series is ready to be merged, what is
>> the properly way to merge? This series has x86 non-sgx (cpufeature, feat_ctl) and sgx
>> changes, and it obviously has KVM changes too. So instance, who should be the one to
>> take this series? And which tree and branch should I rebase to in next version?
> The path of least resistance is likely to get acks for the x86 and sgx changes,
> and let Paolo take it through the KVM tree. The KVM changes are much more
> likely to have non-trivial conflicts, e.g. making exit_reason a union touches a
> ton of code; getting and carrying acked-by for those will be tough sledding.
>

Yes, the best way is to get a topic branch from Thomas or Borislav.

Paolo