Re: [RFC PATCH v2 00/26] KVM SGX virtualization support

Kai Huang
2021-01-21T01:47:53Z

On Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:39:13 +0100 Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 20/01/21 17:35, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2021, Kai Huang wrote:
> >> I'd like to take this chance to ask: when this series is ready to be merged, what is
> >> the properly way to merge? This series has x86 non-sgx (cpufeature, feat_ctl) and sgx
> >> changes, and it obviously has KVM changes too. So instance, who should be the one to
> >> take this series? And which tree and branch should I rebase to in next version?
> > The path of least resistance is likely to get acks for the x86 and sgx changes,
> > and let Paolo take it through the KVM tree. The KVM changes are much more
> > likely to have non-trivial conflicts, e.g. making exit_reason a union touches a
> > ton of code; getting and carrying acked-by for those will be tough sledding.
> >
>
> Yes, the best way is to get a topic branch from Thomas or Borislav.

Thanks Paolo. I'll rebase against tip/x86/sgx for future versions.

>
> Paolo
>